Cited by 256COVID-19 and Mental HealthPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmployment and Welfare Studies

Socioeconomic status and well-being during COVID-19: A resource-based examination.

Open access
Wanberg, Connie R., Csillag, Borbala, Douglass, Richard P., Zhou, Le, Pollard, Michael S.·2020·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The authors assess levels and within-person changes in psychological well-being (i.e., depressive symptoms and life satisfaction) from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic for individuals in the United States, in general and by socioeconomic status (SES). The data is from 2 surveys of 1,143 adults from RAND Corporation's nationally representative American Life Panel, the first administered between April-June, 2019 and the second during the initial peak of the pandemic in the United States in April, 2020. Depressive symptoms during the pandemic were higher than population norms before the pandemic. Depressive symptoms increased from before to during COVID-19 and life satisfaction decreased. Individuals with higher education experienced a greater increase in depressive symptoms and a greater decrease in life satisfaction from before to during COVID-19 in comparison to those with lower education. Supplemental analysis illustrates that income had a curvilinear relationship with changes in well-being, such that individuals at the highest levels of income experienced a greater decrease in life satisfaction from before to during COVID-19 than individuals with lower levels of income. We draw on conservation of resources theory and the theory of fundamental social causes to examine four key mechanisms (perceived financial resources, perceived control, interpersonal resources, and COVID-19-related knowledge/news consumption) underlying the relationship between SES and well-being during COVID-19. These resources explained changes in well-being for the sample as a whole but did not provide insight into why individuals of higher education experienced a greater decline in well-being from before to during COVID-19. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000831

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female gender is associated with a more significant psychological impact, reflecting higher levels of anxiety, stress, and depression, and PTSD during the early pandemic.

    “National and international studies in the early stages of the pandemic crisis indicated that the female gender is associated with a more significant psychological impact, reflecting higher levels of anxiety, stress, and depression (Paulino et al., 2020; Wanberg et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Moreira et al., 2021), and PTSD (González-Sanguino et al., 2020).”

    From Dealing With the Pandemic of COVID-19 in Portugal: On the Important Role of Positivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Coping Strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Wanberg et al., 2020

    The Results (H1 and H2) report increased depressive symptoms during the pandemic, and Method > Measures notes prior evidence of more depressive symptoms among women than men. Neither passage establishes that women experienced a greater psychological impact during the early pandemic or higher pandemic-related anxiety and stress. The sentence cites González-Sanguino et al., not Wanberg et al., for PTSD. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cutler D, Stantcheva S, Alsan M, & Yang D (2020). Disparities in COVID-19 reported incidence, knowledge, and behavior. medRxiv. Retrieved May 19, 2020 from 10.1101/2020.05.15.20095927 PMC7303811 32556260 · DOI
  2. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanberg, C. R., Csillag, B., Douglass, R. P., Zhou, L., & Pollard, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2020-12
Volume
105
Issue
12
Pages
1382-1396
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W3094213434
Cited by
256
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA02595)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, socioeconomic status, psychological well-being, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, conservation of resources theory, income, perceived control, interpersonal resources, news consumption, within-person change
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Educational Status, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Social Class, United States, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review