Cited by 155Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Therapy and Development

Evaluation of a school-based treatment program for young adolescents with ADHD.

Evans, Steven W., Langberg, Joshua M., Schultz, Brandon K., Vaughn, Aaron, Altaye, Mekibib, Marshall, Stephen A., Zoromski, Allison K.·2016·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective This study compared 2 school-based training interventions for adolescents with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): the Challenging Horizons Program-after school version (CHP-AS) and Challenging Horizons Program-mentoring version (CHP-M) with each other and with a community care (CC) condition. Method Participants were 326 students (sixth through eighth grade) diagnosed with ADHD. Interventions were conducted for 1 academic year. CHP-AS occurred twice weekly and included organization, social functioning, and academic study skills interventions. In CHP-M, students were paired with a mentor (e.g., teacher) who was trained by a consultant and delivered a subset of the CHP-AS interventions during school. No direct intervention was provided in CC. Participants were assessed at pretreatment, 4 occasions during the intervention year, posttreatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. Results Intent-to-treatment analyses using hierarchical linear modeling to compare outcomes between the 3 conditions indicate participation in the CHP-AS intervention is associated with moderate effect size improvements in parent-rated organization and time-management skills, homework problems, and ADHD symptoms of inattention, and with small improvements in overall academic functioning and grade point average (GPA). These improvements were in comparison to CC and to CHP-M. Gains were sustained into the next school year and even increased in magnitude for several of the measures. Conclusio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000057

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, S. W., Langberg, J. M., Schultz, B. K., Vaughn, A., Altaye, M., Marshall, S. A., & Zoromski, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2016-01
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
15-30
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2275475575
Cited by
155
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082865, R01MH082864)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, school-based treatment, mentoring, organizational skills, time management, homework problems, academic functioning, inattention, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mentors, School Health Services, Schools, Social Adjustment, Students, Time Management, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review