Cited by 74Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Therapy and Development

Overcoming the research-to-practice gap: A randomized trial with two brief homework and organization interventions for students with ADHD as implemented by school mental health providers.

Open access
Langberg, Joshua M., Dvorsky, Melissa R., Molitor, Stephen J., Bourchtein, Elizaveta, Eddy, Laura D., Smith, Zoe R., Oddo, Lauren E., Eadeh, Hana-May·2018·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 2 brief school-based interventions targeting the homework problems of adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-the Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) intervention and the Completing Homework by Improving Efficiency and Focus (CHIEF) intervention, as implemented by school mental health providers during the school day. A secondary goal was to use moderator analyses to identify student characteristics that may differentially predict intervention response. Method Two-hundred and eighty middle school students with ADHD were randomized to the HOPS or CHIEF interventions or to waitlist, and parent and teacher ratings were collected pre, post, and at a 6-month follow-up. Results Both interventions were implemented with fidelity by school mental health providers. Participants were pulled from elective periods and sessions averaged less than 20 min. Participants in HOPS and CHIEF demonstrated significantly greater improvements in comparison with waitlist on parent ratings of homework problems and organizational skills and effect sizes were large. HOPS participants also demonstrated moderate effect size improvements on materials management and organized action behaviors according to teachers. HOPS participants made significantly greater improvements in parent- and teacher-rated use of organized actions in comparison with CHIEF, but not on measures of homework problems. Moderation analyses revealed that pa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000265

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langberg, J. M., Dvorsky, M. R., Molitor, S. J., Bourchtein, E., Eddy, L. D., Smith, Z. R., Oddo, L. E., & Eadeh, H.-M.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2018-01
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
39-55
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2770112407
Cited by
74
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Funders
U.S. Department of Education (R305A130011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, homework problems, organizational skills, school-based intervention, brief intervention, junior high school students, research-practice gap, service delivery models, behavioral dysregulation, psychopathology severity, intervention moderators
MeSH terms
Professional Practice Gaps, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, School Health Services, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review