The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unique effects of setting goals on behavior change: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Goal setting is a common feature of behavior change interventions, but it is unclear when goal setting is optimally effective. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate: (a) the unique effects of goal setting on behavior change, and (b) under what circumstances and for whom goal setting works best. METHOD: Four databases were searched for articles that assessed the unique effects of goal setting on behavior change using randomized controlled trials. One-hundred and 41 papers were identified from which 384 effect sizes (N = 16,523) were extracted and analyzed. A moderator analysis of sample characteristics, intervention characteristics, inclusion of other behavior change techniques, study design and delivery, quality of study, outcome measures, and behavior targeted was conducted. RESULTS: A random effects model indicated a small positive unique effect of goal setting across a range of behaviors, d = .34 (CI [.28, .41]). Moderator analyses indicated that goal setting was particularly effective if the goal was: (a) difficult, (b) set publicly, and (c) was a group goal. There was weaker evidence that goal setting was more effective when paired with external monitoring of the behavior/outcome by others without feedback and delivered face-to-face. CONCLUSIONS: Goal setting is an effective behavior change technique that has the potential to be considered a fundamental component of successful interventions. The present review adds novel insights into the means by which goal setting might be augmented to maximize behavior change and sets the agenda for future programs of research. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 13×
“Moreover, the analyses support the two central tenets of goal setting theory (Locke & Latham, 2002, 2006), namely, that setting specific and difficult goals are effective at increasing behavior change.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMichie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675 · cited 1×
“…considered to be a key element in helping individuals to regulate their own behavior and has been used in numerous fields including education (e.g., Bandura & Schunk, 1981), sport (e.g., Anshel, Weinberg, & Jackson, 1992), health (e.g., Alexy, 1985), social behaviors (e.g., Madera, King, & Hebl,…”
BackgroundEffective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression.
Michie, S., Abraham, C., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., & Gupta, S. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016136 · Cited by 2,229
Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate
Knapp, G., & Hartung, J. (2003) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1482 · Cited by 2,075
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511
Task complexity: Definition of the construct
Wood, R. E. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 1×
“…people are more committed to the goal; (b) the task is low in complexity (i.e., the number of acts and decisions required to reach the goal is low; Wood, 1986); (c) feedback is received regarding progress toward the goal (Locke & Latham, 2002); and (d) there are adequate situational resources/few…”
BackgroundRecursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170769 · Cited by 800
Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis
Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416 · Cited by 598 · cited 8×
“Task complexity has been the focus of two reviews, one of which found that increased task complexity decreased the effect of goals on individual performance (Wood et al., 1987).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change: A meta-analysis
Epton, T., Harris, P. R., Kane, R., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., & Sheeran, P. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000116 · Cited by 277 · cited 3×
“Where studies measured behavior at multiple time points, we adopted the conservative strategy of calculating the effect size only for the measure at the final time-point (e.g., Epton et al., 2015; Sheeran, Harris, & Epton, 2014).”
MethodResultInfluentialKraemer, H. C., Gardner, C., Brooks, J. O., & Yesavage, J. A. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.1.23 · Cited by 141
The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on performance effectiveness in a MBA program.
Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0087266 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Liverpool, S., Mota, C. P., Sales, C. M. D., Čuš, A., Carletto, S., Hancheva, C., Sousa, S., Cerón, S. C., Moreno-Peral, P., Pietrabissa, G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16317 · Cited by 408
Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science
O'Connor, D. B., Aggleton, J. P., Chakrabarti, B., Cooper, C. L., Creswell, C., Dunsmuir, S., Fiske, S. T., Gathercole, S., Gough, B., Ireland, J. L., et al. (2020) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12468 · Cited by 210
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147
Williamson, O., Swann, C., Bennett, K. J. M., Bird, M. D., Goddard, S. G., Schweickle, M. J., & Jackman, P. C. (2024) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2022.2116723 · Cited by 79
Goal planning in mental health service delivery: A systematic integrative review
Stewart, V., McMillan, S. S., Hu, J., Ng, R., El-Den, S., O’Reilly, C., & Wheeler, A. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1057915 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Epton, T., Currie, S., & Armitage, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1182-1198
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2769434684
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
