Cited by 21Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMental Health via WritingForgiveness and Related Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of a brief web-based interpersonal conflict cognitive reappraisal expressive-writing intervention on changes in romantic conflict during COVID-19 quarantine.

Rodriguez, Lindsey M., Stewart, Sherry H., Neighbors, Clayton·2021·Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

Romantic conflict is known to have escalated during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. This research investigates whether a single-session online writing intervention results in changes in romantic conflict among American adults cohabitating during COVID-19 quarantine (May 2020). Participants (N = 716, 50% female;mean age = 51.8 years) completed a baseline assessment which was followed by a brief (5–8 min) writing task in Qualtrics. Participants were randomized to one of five conditions, where they were asked to write about (a) a conflict with their romantic partner using cognitive reappraisal;(b) a conflict with their romantic partner expressing their deepest thoughts and feelings;(c) a conflict with someone other than their partner using cognitive reappraisal;(d) a conflict with someone other than their partner and a conflict with their partner expressing their deepest thoughts and feelings;or (e) mundane tasks like laundry, house cleaning, or lawn care. In the reappraisal conditions, participants were asked to use this perspective with the target person in the upcoming weeks. Two weeks later, participants were invited to complete a follow-up survey identical to baseline, where they were asked about conflict with their partner during the follow-up period. Results indicated that participants in the romantic partner cognitive reappraisal condition reported fewer disagreements, fewer relationship aggression events, and lower levels of conflict relentlessness with th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cfp0000173

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodriguez, L. M., Stewart, S. H., & Neighbors, C.
Venue
Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2021-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
212-222
ISSN
  • 2160-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-410X
OpenAlex
W3172301521
Cited by
18
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
romantic conflict, cognitive reappraisal, expressive writing, COVID-19 quarantine, lockdown, couples, relational aggression, online intervention, single-session intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review