Cited by 43Memory Processes and InfluencesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

“False memory” is a linguistic convenience.

Bernstein, Daniel M., Scoboria, Alan, Desjarlais, Lecia, Soucie, Kendall·2018·Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cns0000148

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, D. M., Scoboria, A., Desjarlais, L., & Soucie, K.
Affiliations
  • Kwantlen Polytechnic University (CA)
  • University of Windsor (CA)
Venue
Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
Published
2018-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
161-179
ISSN
  • 2326-5523 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5531
OpenAlex
W2802824760
Cited by
43
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research (950–228407)
  • Kwantlen Polytechnic University
  • Social Science and Humanities Research Council (435–2015-0040)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
false memory, language and memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review