Cited by 61Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Promoting Psychological Flexibility in Parents of Adolescents With Chronic Pain: Pilot Study of an 8-Week Group Intervention

Wallace, Dustin P., Woodford, Beth, Connelly, Mark·2016·Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

Parent responses to child pain affect children’s symptoms and functioning including school attendance, social functioning, and depression. In cross-sectional studies, parents’ pain-related psychological flexibility is associated with responses to child pain, but no intervention has yet specifically targeted psychological flexibility in parents of teens with chronic pain. Drawing on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), we created and piloted an 8-week group-based intervention for parents of teens with pain. Eight parents of teens with chronic pain enrolled, and 6 completed the study. Parents completed the Parent Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire, Adult Response to Child Symptoms, and PROMIS Pain Interference Proxy Questionnaire multiple times during the 8-week study and follow-up period (2-week, 3-month, and 6-month); teens also completed the PROMIS Pain Interference Questionnaire at these same time points. Questionnaire responses were evaluated with hierarchical linear modeling; separate slopes were calculated for intervention and follow-up. Results indicated that parent pain-related psychological flexibility increased during the intervention and through follow-up. Protective parenting responses decreased significantly during follow-up only, as did adolescent-rated pain interference. Parents indicated high satisfaction with the intervention. Results of this pilot study suggest that a group-based parent intervention is feasible and can lead to positive changes in par…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cpp0000160

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallace, D. P., Woodford, B., & Connelly, M.
Affiliations
Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wallace, Dustin P.
Venue
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology
Published
2016-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
405-416
ISSN
  • 2169-4826 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4834
OpenAlex
W2559968223
Cited by
61
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Menorah Legacy Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
psychological flexibility, parents of adolescents, chronic pain, acceptance and commitment therapy, group intervention, protective parenting, pain interference, adolescent pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review