Cited by 39Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNursing care and researchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on process measures of family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Han, Areum, Yuen, Hon K., Lee, Hee Yun, Zhou, Xiaohua·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.10.004

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, A., Yuen, H. K., Lee, H. Y., & Zhou, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Areum
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
18
Pages
201-213
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092523048
Cited by
39
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
ACT
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, family caregivers, psychological flexibility, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self-as-context, cognitive fusion, valued living, mindfulness, committed action, process indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review