Cited by 23Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFamily and Disability Support ResearchPsychology and Mental Health

Mindfulness and acceptance interventions for parents of children and adolescents diagnosed with chronic medical conditions: A systematic review

Ruskin, Danielle, Young, Melissa, Sugar, Carly, Nofech-Mozes, Jaclyn·2021·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness and acceptance interventions (MAIs) have been identified as potentially beneficial for parents of children and adolescents diagnosed with chronic medical conditions. Objective: The objective of this review was to provide a descriptive summary of the existing literature on MAIs delivered to parents of children and adolescents diagnosed with chronic medical conditions. Data sources: Electronic searches were conducted by a Library Information Specialist familiar with the field by using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews Databases, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Study eligibility, participants, and interventions: Peer-reviewed journal articles of MAIs delivered to parents of children and adolescents (birth to 18 years of age) diagnosed with a chronic medical condition were eligible for inclusion. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: A total of 18 studies involving 793 parents met inclusion criteria and thus were included in this review. The majority of studies were either pre/post design (n = 8) or randomized controlled trials (n = 6). Most interventions were delivered within a group (n = 6) or individually (n = 5). Nearly all studies (n = 14) reported statistically significant outcomes following the MAI intervention. Conclusions and implications of key findings: Descriptive information yielded from this review provides promising evidence that MAIs are being delivered to parents across the world and many researchers are using similar outcome measures when assessing the psychological flexibility, acceptance, and mindfulness skills following participation in MAIs among this population of parents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2020.0191

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruskin, D., Young, M., Sugar, C., & Nofech-Mozes, J.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Department of Psychology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Corresponding author
Young, Melissa
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
120-135
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
OpenAlex
W3097390891
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
children with chronic illness, adolescents with chronic conditions, psychological flexibility, acceptance, mindfulness skills, parent intervention, group intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Parents, Parenting, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review