The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social support and classroom management are related to secondary students’ general school adjustment: A multilevel structural equation model using student and teacher ratings.
Abstract
Teachers’ social support and classroom management are related to secondary students’ achievement, domain-specific interest, and self-concept. However, little is known about whether social support and classroom management shape secondary students’ general school adjustment beyond these domain-specific outcomes. To investigate this question, we drew on data from a large longitudinal research project (N = 5,607 secondary students, N = 227 classes). We applied student and teacher ratings of social support and classroom management to investigate their perspective-specific validities for predicting student outcomes. To measure students’ school adjustment, we assessed achievement as a domain-specific indicator and school satisfaction, truancy, and self-esteem as more general aspects. Multilevel confirmatory factor analyses showed that both teachers and students distinguished between social support and classroom management. Teacher and student ratings of classroom management largely converged, whereas their perceptions of social support were not statistically significantly associated with one another. In multilevel structural equation modeling, both perspectives uniquely predicted students’ school adjustment: Student-rated social support was linked to all outcomes at the student level and to school satisfaction and self-esteem at the class level. Classroom management showed only weak associations with outcomes at the student level, but at the class level, student-rated classroom management was related to truancy and teacher-rated classroom management was linked to school satisfaction and student achievement. These findings highlight the important role of teachers in students’ general school adjustment and show the benefit of considering different perspectives and levels of analyses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous multilevel studies have found that the measurement structure of social support varies across levels of measurement.
“Previous studies using multilevel analyses have found that the measurement structure of social support varies across levels of measurement (Aldrup et al., 2018; Downer et al., 2014).”
From The Importance of Social Support in Recovery Populations: Toward a Multilevel Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as Aldrup et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311421793 · Cited by 2,370
Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0026802 · Cited by 1,562
Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032583 · Cited by 1,553
Self-citationSources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308321456 · Cited by 1,514 · cited 1×
“…appears reasonable considering that positive regard and encouragement from others as well as individual assistance in overcoming task-related difficulties could be particularly important for developing positive self-related beliefs (Harter, 1999; Lemay & Ashmore, 2006; Usher & Pajares, 2008).”
BackgroundClassroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027268 · Cited by 1,229
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Importance of Social Support in Recovery Populations: Toward a Multilevel Understanding
Islam, M. F., Guerrero, M., Nguyen, R. L., Porcaro, A., Cummings, C., Stevens, E., Kang, A., & Jason, L. A. (2023) · Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07347324.2023.2181119 · Cited by 36
“Previous studies using multilevel analyses have found that the measurement structure of social support varies across levels of measurement (Aldrup et al., 2018; Downer et al., 2015).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1066-1083
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2793555014
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 25.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- social support, classroom management, school adjustment, high school students, teacher ratings, student ratings, school satisfaction, truancy, self-esteem, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review