Cited by 174Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEmotions and Moral Behavior

Warm thanks: Gratitude expression facilitates social affiliation in new relationships via perceived warmth

Williams, Lisa A., Bartlett, Monica Y.·2015·Emotion

Abstract

Recent theorizing on the nature and function of gratitude (the find-remind-and-bind theory; Algoe, 2012) stipulates that expressing gratitude should serve to alert previously unacquainted peers to the potential for a high-quality social bond (i.e., a find function). Although the logic of this premise is supported by extant research, it has not, as yet, been tested empirically. In the current study, participants received a note from a previously unacquainted peer that contained an expression of gratitude (or did not) with regard to prior benefits provided by the participant. After providing ratings of the peer and ostensibly completing the study, participants were given an opportunity to spontaneously give their contact information to the peer, which served as a behavioral measure of affiliation. In line with the proposed find function of gratitude expressions, recipients of expressions of gratitude were more likely to extend the effort to continue the relationship with the novel peer by providing that peer with a means to contact them. This experiment also provided evidence that perceptions of interpersonal warmth (e.g., friendliness, thoughtfulness) serve as the mechanism via which gratitude expressions facilitate affiliation: insofar as gratitude expressions signaled interpersonal warmth of the expresser, they prompted investment in the burgeoning social bond. As such, these findings provide the first empirical evidence regarding 1 of the 3 central premises of the find-remind-and-bind theory of gratitude (Algoe, 2012) in the context of novel relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/emo0000017

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, L. A., & Bartlett, M. Y.
Affiliations
Gonzaga University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2015
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2315689228
Cited by
174
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
gratitude expression, social affiliation, perceived warmth, interpersonal warmth, relationship investment, prosocial behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review