The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543
THE WARM‐COLD VARIABLE IN FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF PERSONS
KELLEY, H. H. (1950) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1950.tb01260.x · Cited by 509
Cited by
Ohanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043
Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420030103 · Cited by 1,283
Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024 · Cited by 804
Cabral, R. R., & Smith, T. B. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025266 · Cited by 651
Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust and choice in virtual markets
Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20041 · Cited by 683
Muda, M., & Hamzah, M. I. (2021) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-04-2020-0072 · Cited by 225
Foundations of multicultural psychology: Research to inform effective practice.
Smith, T. B., & Trimble, J. E. (2016) · doi:10.1037/14733-000 · Cited by 132
Perceived Believability of Research Results Information in Advertising
Beltramini, R. F., & Evans, K. R. (1985) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1985.10672953 · Cited by 79
How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Basol, M., Kácha, O., Rathje, S., & Traberg, C. S. (2021) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2021.23 · Cited by 71
“A significant factor contributing to source credibility is similarity between the source and message receiver (Chaiken & Maheswaran, 1994; Metzger et al., 2003), particularly attitudinal (Simons et al., 1970) and ideological similarity (Marks et al., 2019).”
BackgroundBehn, A., Davanzo, A., & Errázuriz, P. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22616 · Cited by 47
Intellectually Humble, but Prejudiced People. A Paradox of Intellectual Virtue
Colombo, M., Strangmann, K., Houkes, L., Kostadinova, Z., & Brandt, M. J. (2021) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-020-00496-4 · Cited by 19
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
How Partisan Crowds Affect News Evaluation
Jakesch, M., Koren, M., Evtushenko, A., & Naaman, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/baxts
Metadata
- Authors
- Simons, H. W., Berkowitz, N. N., & Moyer, R. J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2094930818
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 74.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
