Cited by 625Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Retention of abstract ideas.

Posner, Michael I., Keele, Steven W.·1970·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0028558

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1970-02
Volume
83
Issue
2, Pt.1
Pages
304-308
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024311997
Cited by
625
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
abstract concepts, retention, memory retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review