Cited by 31Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

The impact of sleep on novel concept learning

Graveline, Yvette M., Wamsley, Erin J.·2017·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Prior research demonstrates that sleep benefits memory consolidation. But beyond its role in memory retention, sleep may also facilitate the reorganization and flexible use of new information. In the present study, we investigated the effect of sleep on conceptual knowledge. Participants classified abstract dot patterns into novel categories, and were later tested on both previously seen dot patterns as well as on new patterns. A Wake group (n=17) trained at 9AM, continued with their daily activities, and then tested at 9PM that evening. A Sleep group (n=20) trained at 9PM, went home to sleep, and was tested the following morning at 9AM. Two Immediate Test control groups completed testing immediately following training in either the morning (n=18) or evening (n=18). Post-training sleep led to superior classification of all stimulus types, including the specific exemplars learned during training, novel patterns that had not previously been seen, and "prototype" patterns from which the exemplars were derived. However, performance did not improve significantly above baseline after a night of sleep. Instead, sleep appeared to maintain performance, relative to a performance decline across a day of wakefulness. There was additionally evidence of a time of day effect on performance. Together with prior observations, these data support the notion that sleep may be involved in an important process whereby we extract commonalities from our experiences to construct useful mental models of the world around us.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.03.008

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep not only quantitatively strengthens memory, but also qualitatively transforms past memory traces in a way that may help respond to similar events in the future.

    “Yet critically, sleep not only quantitatively strengthens memory, but also qualitatively transforms past memory traces in a way that may help us respond to similar events in the future.”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graveline, Y. M., & Wamsley, E. J.
Affiliations
Furman University (US)
Corresponding author
Wamsley, Erin J.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
141
Pages
19-26
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593036750
Cited by
31
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Furman University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep, conceptual knowledge, memory consolidation, prototype learning, categorization, time of day effects, mental models, exemplar-based learning, performance maintenance
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adolescent, Adult, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep, Wakefulness, Knowledge, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review