Cited by 120Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

The role of the basal ganglia in category learning

Ashby, F. Gregory, Ennis, John M.·2006·Psychology of Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-7421(06)46001-1

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashby, F. G., & Ennis, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Pages
1-36
ISSN
0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1785139398
Cited by
120
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
basal ganglia, category learning, neuroplasticity, rule-based learning, basal ganglia disorders, neuropsychology, functional neuroanatomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review