Cited by 808Cognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of the human behavior.

Jinks, J. L., Fulker, D. W.·1970·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0029135

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biometric model explains phenotypic variation as influenced by additive genetic factors (A), non-additive genetic effects (D), shared environmental factors (C) and non-shared environmental factors (E).

    “The biometric model explains phenotypic variation as influenced by additive genetic factors (A), non-additive genetic effects (D), shared environmental factors (C) and non-shared environmental factors (E) (Eaves, Last, Young, & Martin, 1978; Fisher, 1918; Jinks & Fulker, 1970).”
  • Artifactual interactions can occur from subtle changes in the definition and scaling of variables.

    “Yet another concern when testing for interaction effects is the potential for artifactual interactions that can occur secondary to subtle changes in definition and scaling of the variables”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jinks, J. L., & Fulker, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1970-05
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
311-349
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2004880902
Cited by
808
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
30.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
quantitative genetics, classical genetics, human behavior, behavioral genetics
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Child, Educational Status, Environment, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Genotype, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Mathematics, Models, Psychological, Neurotic Disorders, Personality, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Sex, Twins, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review