Cited by 20Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFace Recognition and PerceptionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Test-retest reliability of the facial expression labeling task

Open access
Cecilione, Jennifer L., Rappaport, Lance M., Verhulst, Brad, Carney, Dever M., Blair, R. J. R., Brotman, Melissa A., Leibenluft, Ellen, Pine, Daniel S. +2 more·2017·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Recognizing others' emotional expressions is vital for socioemotional development; impairments in this ability occur in several psychiatric disorders. Further study is needed to map the development of this ability and to evaluate its components as potential transdiagnostic endophenotypes. Before doing so, however, research is required to substantiate the test-retest reliability of scores of the face emotion identification tasks linked to developmental psychopathology. The current study estimated test-retest reliability of scores of one such task, the facial expression labeling task (FELT) among a sample of twin children (N = 157; ages 9-14). Participants completed the FELT at two visits two to five weeks apart. Participants discerned the emotion presented of faces depicting six emotions (i.e., happiness, anger, sadness, fear, surprise, and disgust) morphed with a neutral face to provide 10 levels of increasing emotional expressivity. The present study found strong test-retest reliability (Pearson r) of the FELT scores across all emotions. Results suggested that data from this task may be effectively analyzed using a latent growth curve model to estimate overall ability (i.e., intercept; r's = 0.76-0.85) and improvement as emotions become clearer (i.e., linear slope; r's = 0.69-0.83). Evidence of high test-retest reliability of this task's scores informs future developmental research and the potential identification of transdiagnostic endophenotypes for child psychopathology. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000439

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ekman P Friesen WV 1976 Pictures of facial affect Consulting Psychologists Press
  2. Nowicki S Duke MP 1994 Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 18 1 9 35
  3. Steinberg L Morris AS 2001 Adolescent development Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 2 1 55 87
  4. Wagner HL 1993 On measuring performance in category judgment studies of nonverbal behavior Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 17 1 3 28

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cecilione, J. L., Rappaport, L. M., Verhulst, B., Carney, D. M., Blair, R. J. R., Brotman, M. A., Leibenluft, E., Pine, D. S., Roberson-Nay, R., & Hettema, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2017-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1537-1542
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2589859767
Cited by
20
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01MH098055, T32MH020030, IRP-ziamh002781)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
test-retest reliability, emotion recognition, developmental psychopathology, twins, latent growth curve models, morphed faces, social-emotional development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Twins, Reproducibility of Results, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review