Cited by 143Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Effects of MDMA and intranasal oxytocin on social and emotional processing

Open access
Kirkpatrick, Matthew G, Lee, Royce, Wardle, Margaret C, Jacob, Suma, de Wit, Harriet·2014·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

MDMA (± 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, 'ecstasy') is used recreationally, reportedly because it increases feelings of empathy, sociability, and interpersonal closeness. One line of evidence suggests that MDMA produces these effects by releasing oxytocin, a peptide involved in social bonding. In the current study, we investigated the acute effects of MDMA and oxytocin on social and emotional processing in healthy human volunteers. MDMA users (N = 65) participated in a 4-session, within-between-subjects study in which they received oral MDMA (0.75, 1.5 mg/kg), intranasal oxytocin (20 or 40 IU), or placebo under double-blind conditions. The primary outcomes included measures of emotion recognition and sociability (desire to be with others). Cardiovascular and subjective effects were also assessed. As expected, MDMA dose-dependently increased heart rate and blood pressure and feelings of euphoria (eg, 'High' and 'Like Drug'). On measures of social function, MDMA impaired recognition of angry and fearful facial expressions, and the larger dose (1.5 mg/kg) increased desire to be with others, compared with placebo. Oxytocin produced small but significant increases in feelings of sociability and enhanced recognition of sad facial expressions. Additionally, responses to oxytocin were related to responses to MDMA with subjects on two subjective measures of sociability. Thus, MDMA increased euphoria and feelings of sociability, perhaps by reducing sensitivity to subtle signs of negative emotions in others. The present findings provide only limited support for the idea that oxytocin produces the prosocial effects of MDMA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2014.12

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MDMA's softening of rigid self-protective mechanisms reduces interpersonal defensiveness and increases sensitivity to emotional and relational dynamics, allowing deeper engagement in the therapeutic process.

    “MDMA’s softening of rigid self-protective mechanisms reduces interpersonal defensiveness, and increases sensitivity to emotional and relational dynamics, allowing for deeper engagement in the therapeutic process (88, 100, 102).”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports increased sociability and reduced recognition of negative facial expressions, and suggests these effects may help people with PTSD engage with a therapist. It does not measure rigid self-protective mechanisms or interpersonal defensiveness, and it presents therapeutic engagement as a possibility rather than an established effect. The claim also overgeneralizes emotional sensitivity: the study found reduced recognition of negative expressions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MDMA's prosocial effects (increased sociability, decreased social sensitivity) are linked to improved therapeutic engagement, making patients less guarded and more willing to explore painful emotional material.

    “Additionally, its prosocial effects - such as increased sociability and decreased social sensitivity - have been linked to improved therapeutic engagement (81, 88), making patients less guarded and more willing to explore painful emotional material.”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Discussion reports increased sociability and reduced recognition of negative expressions, and suggests these effects may facilitate engagement with a therapist and help clients focus on negative emotions. But the study tested healthy volunteers, not patients in therapy, and did not establish that MDMA makes patients less guarded or more willing to explore painful material. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MDMA at 1.5 mg/kg, but not 0.75 mg/kg, decreased the accuracy of fear recognition and of anger and fear recognition.

    “This is in line with further results showing that 1.5 mg/kg but not 0.75 mg/kg MDMA decreased the accuracy of fear recognition (55) and anger and fear recognition (36).”
  • After administration of 1.5 mg/kg MDMA, participants reported a significantly increased desire to engage in social activities.

    “after the administration of 1.5 mg/kg MDMA participants reported a significantly increased desire to engage in social activities (36)”
  • No effect was found on the evaluation of romantic relationships of others or on attractiveness ratings after MDMA.

    “Furthermore, no effect was found on the evaluation of romantic relationships of others (80) or on attractiveness ratings (36).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirkpatrick, M. G., Lee, R., Wardle, M. C., Jacob, S., & de Wit, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
1654-1663
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2045231516
Cited by
143
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000430)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA026570, R21DA026570, DA 02812, R01DA002812)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy, intranasal oxytocin, social processing, emotional processing, emotion recognition, facial expression recognition, sociability, prosocial effects, empathy, cardiovascular effects, euphoria, dose dependence
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Blood Pressure, Choice Behavior, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Hallucinogens, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Linear Models, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review