The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences among dark triad components: a meta-analytic investigation
Abstract
range = 7 to 42). Our results indicate that the nomological networks of psychopathy and Machiavellianism overlap substantially while narcissism demonstrated differential relations compared with psychopathy and Machiavellianism. These results remained relatively constant after controlling for DT assessment approach. We argue that the current literature on Machiavellianism may be better understood as a secondary psychopathy literature. Future directions for DT research are discussed in light of our meta-analytic results. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“there is an interpretative difference between the concept of narcissism (measured as a whole) and the statistical variance that is left once the other traits have been accounted for (58)”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6 · Cited by 5,265
Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113514105 · Cited by 2,162
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019265 · Cited by 2,093
A Narcissistic Personality Inventory.
Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590 · Cited by 1,975
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 · Cited by 1,961
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3 · Cited by 1,435
Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder
Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131215 · Cited by 1,082
A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations
Hare, R. D. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8 · Cited by 1,032
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244 · Cited by 572
Self-citationScreening for Dark Personalities
Paulhus, D. L., Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Jones, D. N. (2020) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000602 · Cited by 436
Upsides to Dark and Downsides to Bright Personality: A Multidomain Review and Future Research Agenda
Smith, M. B., Hill, A., Wallace, J. C., Recendes, T., & Judge, T. A. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206317733511 · Cited by 212
Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future
Harms, P. D., Wood, D., Landay, K., Lester, P. B., & Lester, G. V. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.007 · Cited by 230
A Critical Appraisal of the Dark-Triad Literature and Suggestions for Moving Forward
Miller, J. D., Vize, C. E., Crowe, M. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419838233 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L., & Miller, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Venue
- Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 1949-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2531407051
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27
- FWCI
- 32.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- Dark Triad, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, nomological network, assessment methods, personality traits
- MeSH terms
- Antisocial Personality Disorder, Humans, Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Personality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
