Cited by 23Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and BehaviorsGender, Feminism, and Media

“Ur a freakin goddess!”: Examining appearance commentary on Instagram.

Open access
Burnell, Kaitlyn, George, Madeleine J., Kurup, Allycen R., Underwood, Marion K.·2021·Psychology of Popular Media

Abstract

=20.39) received on their posts was observationally coded for positivity and negativity. Receiving positive appearance commentary was common and linked to greater appearance-related social media consciousness, and, weakly, to body surveillance. There were no associations with self-objectification, appearance-contingent self-worth, facial satisfaction, and body dissatisfaction. Negative appearance commentary was not associated with body image concerns. Photos depicting only the self were especially likely to elicit positive appearance commentary. Females received more positive appearance commentary compared to males, whereas males received more negative appearance commentary. Future research should examine long-term effects of receiving appearance comments via Instagram.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ppm0000341

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive comments may also be associated with increased self-objectification, as shown in a study of Australian adolescent girls, and with increased appearance-related social media consciousness, as found in a study of U.S. college students.

    “Positive comments may also be associated with increased self-objectification, as shown in a study of Australian adolescent girls (Slater & Tiggemann, 2015), and with increased appearance-related SM consciousness (ASMC), as found in a study of U.S. college students (Burnell et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bakhshi S, Shamma DA, & Gilbert E (2014). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 965– 974.
  2. Calogero RM, Herbozo S, & Thompson JK (2009). Complimentary weightism: The potential costs of appearance-related commentary for women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 120– 132.
  3. McKinley NM, & Hyde JS (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181– 215.
  4. Moradi B, & Huang Y-P (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology and Women Quarterly, 32, 377– 398.
  5. Noll SM, & Fredrickson BL (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623– 636.
  6. Ringrose J (2011). Are you sexy, flirty, or a slut? Exploring ‘sexualization’ and how teen girls perform/negotiate digital sexual identity on social networking sites. In Gill R & Scharff C (Eds.), New Femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (pp. 99– 116). Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burnell, K., George, M. J., Kurup, A. R., & Underwood, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Psychology of Popular Media
Published
2021-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
422-433
ISSN
  • 2689-6567 (ISSN-L)
  • 2689-6575
OpenAlex
W3154366823
Cited by
22
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Popular Media (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 HD060995)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
Instagram, social media comments, body surveillance, self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, body image, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review