Cited by 365Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Three Problems With Current Digital Mental Health Research . . . and Three Things We Can Do About Them

Open access
Mohr, David C., Weingardt, Ken R., Reddy, Madhu, Schueller, Stephen M.·2017·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

An increasingly large body of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated the efficacy of mental health technologies, such as Web-based and mobile interventions, to prevent and treat mental disorders and increase psychological well-being. However, there is little evidence that these tools can be successfully implemented in clinical settings. The authors highlight three widely held misconceptions that they believe are holding back the field, and they reconceptualize the issues to strengthen the path toward implementation and accelerate innovation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201600541

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 15 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Treating mental health technologies as products has led to developing tools without understanding how they fit into mental health services.

    “Treating mental health technologies as products has meant that we have largely developed the tools without understanding how they can fit in the context of mental health services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Efficacy trials using randomization have repeatedly found that Web-based and mobile programs can treat various psychiatric disorders, especially with low-intensity support by brief calls or messaging.

    “Randomized controlled efficacy trials have consistently demonstrated that Web-based and mobile interventions can treat a range of psychiatric disorders, particularly when coupled with low-intensity support provided via brief phone calls or messaging (1,2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Greater mental health benefits are more consistently obtained when human support is included.

    “However, the relatively consistent finding has been that substantive mental health benefits are more consistently achieved in the context of human support (1), suggesting that mental health technologies are not products–rather, they are technology-enabled services (TESs).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    There is little evidence that mental health technologies can be successfully and sustainably implemented in typical clinical or health care settings.

    “However, there is little evidence that these tools can be successfully implemented in clinical settings.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “However, despite this overwhelming support, there is little evidence that technology-based mental health interventions can be sustainably and effectively implemented in typical health care settings (3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    A number of today's digital mental health tools need support from a coach or therapist to keep users engaged and produce reliable, substantive outcomes.

    “Although improved design and technology may make mental health technologies easier and more engaging to use in the future, many of today’s mental health technologies require some human support from a coach or therapist to sustain engagement and obtain substantive, reliable outcomes (1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Mental health technologies are not products but technology-enabled services (TESs).

    “However, the relatively consistent finding has been that substantive mental health benefits are more consistently achieved in the context of human support (1), suggesting that mental health technologies are not products–rather, they are technology-enabled services (TESs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Getting better from mental health conditions typically demands behavior change maintained across weeks or months.
    • Rests on an assumption: Today’s digital mental health tools demand time, attention, and motivation from patients—resources that are scarce when psychiatric illness reduces motivation and brings hopelessness and helplessness.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Randomized controlled trials have shown that mental health technologies, including Web-based and mobile interventions, can prevent and treat mental disorders and improve psychological well-being.

    “An increasingly large body of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated the efficacy of mental health technologies, such as Web-based and mobile interventions, to prevent and treat mental disorders and increase psychological well-being.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
      “More than 15 years of research and a large number of randomized controlled trials have repeatedly demonstrated the efficacy of these interventions across a range of psychiatric disorders (1,2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This approach takes the technology itself to be the main driver of change.

    “Doing so assumes that the technology is the primary agent of change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Clutching old models prevents a genuine paradigm shift; progress needs fresh behavior-change models that depart from traditional psychotherapy and include finer-grained knowledge of patients' lives.

    “A true paradigm shift cannot be achieved by clinging to old models, however; innovation will require new models of behavior change that move away from traditional psychotherapy models and incorporate more granular understanding of the lives of patients and applications of these technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Participants failed to engage with the online treatments and ceased responding to support calls.

    “Patients did not engage with the Web-based treatments and stopped answering the telephone support calls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

5 of 5
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Getting better from mental health conditions typically demands behavior change maintained across weeks or months.

    “Improvement in mental health conditions usually requires sustained behavior change over many weeks or months.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Today’s digital mental health tools demand time, attention, and motivation from patients—resources that are scarce when psychiatric illness reduces motivation and brings hopelessness and helplessness.

    “Currently available mental health technologies require a patient’s time, attention, and motivation–all things that are in short supply when psychiatric disorders sap motivation and are accompanied by hopelessness and helplessness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Digital mental health tools are largely educational or informational, which may be poorly suited to sustaining engagement and behavior change for many individuals.

    “Furthermore, mental health technologies are mainly didactic or informational, which might not be ideal for promoting sustained engagement and behavior change for many people.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the literature, the technology receives thorough description and evaluation, while its surrounding ecosystem—human support and organizational factors—receives little.

    “The technology itself is thoroughly described and evaluated, but there is little description or evaluation of the ecosystem around that technology (such as human support and organizational factors).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical trials frequently look unlike actual care settings because they prioritize internal validity over practical matters like technology environment, implementation, and sustainment.

    “Trials often bear little resemblance to clinical settings, having largely emphasized internal validity over real-world issues, such as the technological environment and implementation and sustainment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When clinical research faces recruitment difficulties, a common response is to broaden the pool of potential participants—adding venues, adjusting social media tactics, and similar steps.

    “Recruitment challenges, common in clinical research, are often addressed by increasing the recruitment pool (expanding the number of venues, refining social media strategies, and so on).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Anecdotal accounts from U.S. health care organizations that attempted these interventions align with the trial results.

    “This is consistent with reports we have heard from health care organizations in the United States that have tried these interventions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The use of technologies for behavior change outside mental health has tended to view these tools as new forms of interventions.

    “Although the use of technologies for behavior change outside of mental health has tended to view these tools as new forms of interventions (such as activity monitoring or diet management), the perception has persisted in some mental health circles that mental health technologies are a new method of delivering evidence-based psychotherapy via the Web or mobile phone.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohr, D. C., Weingardt, K. R., Reddy, M., & Schueller, S. M.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
427-429
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2605602096
Cited by
365
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 5
FWCI
31.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH090318, R01MH111610, R01MH100482, R01MH095753, K08MH102336)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
digital mental health, online intervention, mobile-based interventions, mental health technology, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Health Services Research, Humans, Medical Informatics Applications, Mental Health Services, Biomedical Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review