Cited by 16Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and AccessPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Treatment dropout among veterans and their families: Quantitative and qualitative findings.

Open access
Amsalem, Doron, Lopez-Yianilos, Andrea, Lowell, Ari, Pickover, Alison M., Arnon, Shay, Zhu, Xi, Suarez-Jimenez, Benjamin, Ryba, Matt +7 more·2022·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy noncompletion rates for veterans and their families are high. This study sought to (a) measure noncompletion rates of such patients at a university-based treatment center, (b) compare veteran and family member attrition rates, (c) identify dropout predictors, and (d) explore clinicians' perspectives on treatment noncompletion. METHOD: Using quantitative and qualitative approaches, we analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics of 141 patients (90 military veterans; 51 family members) in a university treatment center. We defined dropout as not completing the time-limited therapy contract. Reviewing semistructured interview data assessing clinicians' perspectives on their patients' dropout, three independent raters agreed on key themes, with interrater coefficient kappa range .74 to 1. RESULTS: Patient attrition was 24%, not differing significantly between veterans and family members. Diagnosis of major depression (MDD) and exposure-based therapies predicted noncompletion, as did higher baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total scores, severe depression (HDRS > 20), lack of Beck Depression Inventory weekly improvement, and history of military sexual trauma. Clinicians mostly attributed noncompletion to patient difficulties coping with intense emotions, especially in exposure-based therapies. CONCLUSION: Noncompletion rate at this study appeared relatively low compared to other veteran-based treatment centers, if still unfortunately substantial. Patients with comorbid MDD/PTSD and exposure-based therapies carried greater noncompletion risk due to the MDD component, and this should be considered in treatment planning. Ongoing discussion of dissatisfaction and patient discontinuation, in the context of a strong therapeutic alliance, might reduce noncompletion in this at-risk population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0001109

Cites

42 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The withdrawal/dropout rate of 17.2% is in line with overall attrition rates found in adult psychotherapy across settings (19.7%), slightly lower than treatment dropout rates found among veterans and their families (24%), and substantially lower than dropout rates found among veterans in treatment for PTSD (36%).

    “This rate is in line with overall attrition rates found in adult psychotherapy across settings (19.7%) [58], is slightly lower than treatment dropout rates found among veterans and their families (24%) [59], and is substantially lower than dropout rates found among veterans in treatment for PTSD (36%) [60].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amsalem, D., Lopez-Yianilos, A., Lowell, A., Pickover, A. M., Arnon, S., Zhu, X., Suarez-Jimenez, B., Ryba, M., Bergman, M., Such, S., Zalman, H., Sanchez-Lacay, A., Lazarov, A., Markowitz, J. C., & Neria, Y.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2022-05
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
578-586
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W3200882078
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital
  • Stand for the Troops Foundation
  • Bob Woodruff Foundation
  • Acron Hill Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH118428-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
treatment discontinuation, veterans, veterans' families, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, exposure therapy, military sexual trauma, depression severity, therapeutic relationship, clinician perspectives, patient dissatisfaction
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Military Personnel, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review