Cited by 357Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Activation of NMDA receptors induces dephosphorylation of DARPP-32 in rat striatal slices

Halpain, Shelley, Girault, Jean-Antoine, Greengard, Paul·1990·Nature

Abstract

In the caudate-putamen the glutamatergic cortical input and the dopaminergic nigrostriatal input have opposite effects on the firing rate of striatal neurons. Although little is known of the biochemical mechanisms underlying this antagonism, one action of dopamine is to stimulate the cyclic AMP-dependent phosphorylation of DARPP-32 (dopamine and cAMP-regulated phospho-protein, of relative molecular mass 32,000 (32K]. This phosphorylation converts DARPP-32 from an inactive molecule into a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1. Here we show that activation of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) subclass of glutamate receptors reverses the cAMP-stimulated phosphorylation of DARPP-32 in striatal slices through NMDA-induced dephosphorylation of DARPP-32. Thus, the antagonistic effects of dopamine and glutamate on the excitability of striatal neurons are reflected in antagonistic effects of these neurotransmitters on the state of phosphorylation of DARPP-32. Our results indicate that stimulation of NMDA receptors leads to the activation of a neuronal protein phosphatase, presumably the calcium-dependent phosphatase calcineurin, and show, in an intact cell preparation, that signal transduction in the nervous system can be mediated by protein dephosphorylation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/343369a0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpain, S., Girault, J.-A., & Greengard, P.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Nature
Published
1990-01
Volume
343
Issue
6256
Pages
369-372
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2049668076
Cited by
357
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
NMDA receptor, DARPP-32, dephosphorylation, striatum, protein phosphatase 1, calcineurin, dopamine, glutamate, cAMP signaling, signal transduction, calcium-dependent phosphatase
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Animals, Aspartic Acid, Calmodulin-Binding Proteins, Corpus Striatum, Dibenzocycloheptenes, Enzyme Activation, Colforsin, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phosphates, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Phosphothreonine, Protein Kinases, Valine, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate, Dizocilpine Maleate, Receptors, Neurotransmitter, Calcineurin, Rats, Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32, Protein Phosphatase 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review