The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641 · Cited by 3,010
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Lande, R. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285580 · Cited by 2,143
Boyce, M. S. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002405 · Cited by 1,242
On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management
Beissinger, S. R., & Westphal, M. I. (1998) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802534 · Cited by 1,118
Estimates of Lethal Equivalents and the Cost of Inbreeding in Mammals
RALLS, K., BALLOU, J. D., & TEMPLETON, A. (1988) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00169.x · Cited by 789
International Union for Conservation of Nature
(2011) · Permanent Missions to the United Nations · doi:10.18356/9789210544207c209 · Cited by 775
Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology.
Thompson, D. B. A., Burgman, M. A., Ferson, S., & Akcakaya, H. R. (1994) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261313 · Cited by 676
Self-citationMeta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution
Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89073-4 · Cited by 570
Fennessy, P. F. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.1984.10426307 · Cited by 528
Cited by
The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., & Sexton, J. O. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246752 · Cited by 3,542
Ecological Forecasts: An Emerging Imperative
Clark, J. S., Carpenter, S. R., Barber, M., Collins, S., Dobson, A., Foley, J. A., Lodge, D. M., Pascual, M., Pielke, R., Pizer, W., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.293.5530.657 · Cited by 913
Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations
O’Grady, J. J., Brook, B. W., Reed, D. H., Ballou, J. D., Tonkyn, D. W., & Frankham, R. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.016 · Cited by 498
Self-citationEmerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis
Reed, J. M., Mills, L. S., Dunning, J. B., Menges, E. S., McKelvey, K. S., Frye, R., Beissinger, S. R., Anstett, M., & Miller, P. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99419.x · Cited by 462
Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S., & Jones, M. H. (2001) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(01)32013-5 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Brook, B. W., O'Grady, J. J., Chapman, A. P., Burgman, M. A., Akçakaya, H. R., & Frankham, R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 404
- Issue
- 6776
- Pages
- 385-387
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1969609509
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 39.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/35006050
- The paper
- Brook, B. W., O'Grady, J. J., Chapman, A. P., Burgman, M. A., Akçakaya, H. R., & Frankham, R. (2000). Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/35006050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
