Cited by 635Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsIon channel regulation and function

Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification

Nishiyama, Makoto, Hong, Kyonsoo, Mikoshiba, Katsuhiko, Poo, Mu-ming, Kato, Kunio·2000·Nature

Abstract

Activity-induced synaptic modification is essential for the development and plasticity of the nervous system. Repetitive correlated activation of pre- and postsynaptic neurons can induce persistent enhancement or decrement of synaptic efficacy, commonly referred to as long-term potentiation or depression (LTP or LTD). An important unresolved issue is whether and to what extent LTP and LTD are restricted to the activated synapses. Here we show that, in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, reduction of postsynaptic calcium influx by partial blockade of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors results in a conversion of LTP to LTD and a loss of input specificity normally associated with LTP, with LTD appearing at heterosynaptic inputs. The induction of LTD at homo- and heterosynaptic sites requires functional ryanodine receptors and inositol triphosphate (InsP3) receptors, respectively. Functional blockade or genetic deletion of type 1 InsP3 receptors led to a conversion of LTD to LTP and elimination of heterosynaptic LTD, whereas blocking ryanodine receptors eliminated only homosynaptic LTD. Thus, postsynaptic Ca2+, deriving from Ca2+ influx and differential release of Ca2+ from internal stores through ryanodine and InsP3 receptors, regulates both the polarity and input specificity of activity-induced synaptic modification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35046067

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nishiyama, M., Hong, K., Mikoshiba, K., Poo, M.-M., & Kato, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Poo, Mu-ming
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-11
Volume
408
Issue
6812
Pages
584-588
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1589692855
Cited by
635
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
long-term potentiation, long-term depression, synaptic plasticity, input specificity, heterosynaptic plasticity, ryanodine receptor, IP3 receptor, NMDA receptor blockade, hippocampal CA1, calcium influx
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Hippocampus, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Synapses, Calcium Channels, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate, N-Methylaspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review