Cited by 879Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cellular mechanism of reward-related learning

Abstract

Positive reinforcement helps to control the acquisition of learned behaviours. Here we report a cellular mechanism in the brain that may underlie the behavioural effects of positive reinforcement. We used intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) as a model of reinforcement learning, in which each rat learns to press a lever that applies reinforcing electrical stimulation to its own substantia nigra. The outputs from neurons of the substantia nigra terminate on neurons in the striatum in close proximity to inputs from the cerebral cortex on the same striatal neurons. We measured the effect of substantia nigra stimulation on these inputs from the cortex to striatal neurons and also on how quickly the rats learned to press the lever. We found that stimulation of the substantia nigra (with the optimal parameters for lever-pressing behaviour) induced potentiation of synapses between the cortex and the striatum, which required activation of dopamine receptors. The degree of potentiation within ten minutes of the ICSS trains was correlated with the time taken by the rats to learn ICSS behaviour. We propose that stimulation of the substantia nigra when the lever is pressed induces a similar potentiation of cortical inputs to the striatum, positively reinforcing the learning of the behaviour by the rats.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35092560

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 879

Metadata

Authors
Reynolds, J. N. J., Hyland, B. I., & Wickens, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Wickens, Jeffery R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2001-09
Volume
413
Issue
6851
Pages
67-70
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2055523610
Cited by
879
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Saint Petersburg State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
reward learning, positive reinforcement, intracranial self-stimulation, substantia nigra, striatum, synaptic potentiation, dopamine receptors, learning acquisition
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Learning, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Self Stimulation, Substantia Nigra, Synapses, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review