The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prepublication data sharing
Open accessAbstract
Rapid release of prepublication data has served the field of genomics well. Attendees at a workshop in Toronto recommend extending the practice to other biological data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International network of cancer genome projects
The International Cancer Genome Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08987 · Cited by 2,299
The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium
Bernstein, B. E., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Costello, J. F., Ren, B., Milosavljevic, A., Meissner, A., Kellis, M., Marra, M. A., Beaudet, A. L., Ecker, J. R., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1010-1045 · Cited by 1,892
Toward interoperable bioscience data
Sansone, S.-A., Rocca-Serra, P., Field, D., Maguire, E., Taylor, C., Hofmann, O., Fang, H., Neumann, S., Tong, W., Amaral-Zettler, L., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1054 · Cited by 475
Digital pathology and computational image analysis in nephropathology
Barisoni, L., Lafata, K. J., Hewitt, S. M., Madabhushi, A., & Balis, U. G. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0321-6 · Cited by 264
Stodden, V., Guo, P., & Ma, Z. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067111 · Cited by 257
10KP: A phylodiverse genome sequencing plan
Cheng, S., Melkonian, M., Smith, S. A., Brockington, S., Archibald, J. M., Delaux, P.-M., Li, F.-W., Melkonian, B., Mavrodiev, E. V., Sun, W., et al. (2018) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giy013 · Cited by 248
The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research
Kaye, J. (2012) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454 · Cited by 240
Towards reproducible computational drug discovery
Schaduangrat, N., Lampa, S., Simeon, S., Gleeson, M. P., Spjuth, O., & Nantasenamat, C. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-0408-x · Cited by 208
Open data and digital morphology
Davies, T. G., Rahman, I. A., Lautenschlager, S., Cunningham, J. A., Asher, R. J., Barrett, P. M., Bates, K. T., Bengtson, S., Benson, R. B. J., Boyer, D. M., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0194 · Cited by 181
The Complexities of Genomic Identifiability
Rodriguez, L. L., Brooks, L. D., Greenberg, J. H., & Green, E. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234593 · Cited by 144
Transforming Epidemiology for 21st Century Medicine and Public Health
Khoury, M. J., Lam, T. K., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Hartge, P., Spitz, M. R., Buring, J. E., Chanock, S. J., Croyle, R. T., Goddard, K. A., Ginsburg, G. S., et al. (2013) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0146 · Cited by 119
Jao, I., Kombe, F., Mwalukore, S., Bull, S., Parker, M., Kamuya, D., Molyneux, S., & Marsh, V. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135545 · Cited by 71
Benefits and barriers in the design of harmonized access agreements for international data sharing
Saulnier, K. M., Bujold, D., Dyke, S. O. M., Dupras, C., Beck, S., Bourque, G., & Joly, Y. (2019) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0310-4 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Authors, T. I. D. R. W.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 461
- Issue
- 7261
- Pages
- 168-170
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1699155395
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
