Cited by 708Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Vascular endothelial growth factor enhances atherosclerotic plaque progression

Celletti, Francesca L., Waugh, Jacob M., Amabile, Philippe G., Brendolan, Andrea, Hilfiker, Paul R., Dake, Michael D.·2001·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can promote angiogenesis but may also exert certain effects to alter the rate of atherosclerotic plaque development. To evaluate this potential impact on plaque progression, we treated cholesterol-fed mice doubly deficient in apolipoprotein E/apolipoprotein B100 with low doses of VEGF (2 microg/kg) or albumin. VEGF significantly increased macrophage levels in bone marrow and peripheral blood and increased plaque area 5-, 14- and 4-fold compared with controls at weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Plaque macrophage and endothelial cell content also increased disproportionately over controls. In order to confirm that the VEGF-mediated plaque progression was not species-specific, the experiment was repeated in cholesterol-fed rabbits at the three-week timepoint, which showed comparable increases in plaque progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/86490

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A major disadvantage of therapeutic angiogenesis with nanoparticles might be that they accumulate in plaques, contributing to neovascularization and advancing plaque accumulation.

    “A major disadvantage of this approach, as can be deduced from the build-up of atherosclerotic plaques, might be that these nanoparticles accumulate in the plaques, thus contributing to neovascularization and thereby advancing plaque accumulation112.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celletti, F. L., Waugh, J. M., Amabile, P. G., Brendolan, A., Hilfiker, P. R., & Dake, M. D.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Dake, Michael D.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2001-04
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
425-429
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W1561059299
Cited by
708
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 21
FWCI
19.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
vascular endothelial growth factor, atherosclerosis, atherosclerotic plaque progression, macrophage accumulation, apolipoprotein E deficiency, cholesterol-fed rabbits, angiogenesis, endothelial cells, plaque composition
MeSH terms
Animals, Apolipoproteins B, Apolipoproteins E, Arteriosclerosis, Diet, Atherogenic, Disease Models, Animal, Endothelium, Vascular, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Lymphokines, Macrophages, Monocytes, Rabbits, Recombinant Proteins, Endothelial Growth Factors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Mice, Apolipoprotein B-100

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review