Cited by 800Autophagy in Disease and TherapyUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCellular transport and secretion

Ubiquitination and selective autophagy

Open access
Shaid, S, Brandts, C H, Serve, H, Dikic, I·2013·Cell Death & Differentiation

Abstract

Ubiquitination has long been recognised as a key determinator of protein fate by tagging proteins for proteasomal degradation. Most recently, the ability of conjugated ubiquitin chains to confer selectivity to autophagy was demonstrated. Although autophagy was first believed to be a bulk, non-selective 'self-eating' degradative process, the molecular mechanisms of selectivity are now starting to emerge. With the discovery of autophagy receptors - which bind both ubiquitinated substrates and autophagy specific light chain 3 (LC3) modifier on the inner sheath of autophagosomes - a new pathway of selective autophagy is being unravelled. In this review, we focus on the special role of ubiquitin signals and selective autophagy receptors in sorting a variety of autophagic cargos.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cdd.2012.72

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaid, S., Brandts, C. H., Serve, H., & Dikic, I.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Brandts, C H
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2012-06-22
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
21-30
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2048494900
Cited by
800
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ((EXC 115)., SFB,834)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
ubiquitination, selective autophagy, autophagy receptors, LC3, autophagosomes, ubiquitin chains, protein degradation, cargo sorting, proteasomal degradation
MeSH terms
Autophagy, Humans, Signal Transduction, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review