Cited by 511

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting

Shen, Bin, Zhang, Jun, Wu, Hongya, Wang, Jianying, Ma, Ke, Li, Zheng, Zhang, Xueguang, Zhang, Pumin, Huang, Xingxu·2013·Cell Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cr.2013.46

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding a 32 amino acid spacer between the NLS and Cas9 increases DNA cleavage activity.

    “Increasing access to the NLS by adding a 32 amino acid spacer between the NLS and Cas9 was shown to increase DNA cleavage activity (Shen et al., 2013).”

    From Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches (2018) · cites this paper as Shen et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Terns MP, Terns RM . Curr Opin Microbiol 2011; 14:321–327. · DOI
  2. Bhaya D, Davison M, Barrangou R . Ann Rev Genet 2011; 45:273–297. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Taylor GK, Heiter DF, Pietrokovski S, et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:9705–9719. · DOI
  4. Sapranauskas R, Gasiunas G, Fremaux C, et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:9275–9282. · DOI
  5. Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, et al. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9:467–477. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Makarova KS, Aravind L, Wolf YI, et al. Biol Direct 2011; 6:38. · DOI
  7. Makarova KS, Grishin NV, Shabalina SA, et al. Biol Direct 2006; 1:7. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:E2579–E2586. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Huang P, Xiao A, Zhou M, et al. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:699–700. · DOI
  10. Woods IG, Schier AF . Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:650–651. · DOI
  11. Reyon D, Tsai SQ, Khayter C, et al. Nat Biotechnol 2012; 30:460–465. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shen, B., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Wang, J., Ma, K., Li, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, P., & Huang, X.
Venue
Cell Research
Published
2013-04-02
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
720-723
ISSN
  • 1001-0602
  • 1748-7838
Cited by
511
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review