Cited by 151Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockForensic and Genetic Research

Imprint of assortative mating on the human genome

Open access
Yengo, Loic, Robinson, Matthew R., Keller, Matthew C., Kemper, Kathryn E., Yang, Yuanhao, Trzaskowski, Maciej, Gratten, Jacob, Turley, Patrick +6 more·2018·Nature Human Behaviour

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Preference for mates with similar phenotypes; that is, assortative mating, is widely observed in humans 1-5 and has evolutionary consequences 6-8. Under Fisher's classical theory 6, assortative mating is predicted to induce a signature in the genome at trait-associated loci that can be detected and quantified. Here, we develop and apply a method to quantify assortative mating on a specific trait by estimating the correlation (θ) between genetic predictors of the trait from single nucleotide polymorphisms on odd- versus even-numbered chromosomes. We show by theory and simulation that the effect of assortative mating can be quantified in the presence of population stratification. We applied this approach to 32 complex traits and diseases using single nucleotide polymorphism data from ~400,000 unrelated individuals of European ancestry. We found significant evidence of assortative mating for height (θ = 3.2%) and educational attainment (θ = 2.7%), both of which were consistent with theoretical predictions. Overall, our results imply that assortative mating involves multiple traits and affects the genomic architecture of loci that are associated with these traits, and that the consequence of mate choice can be detected from a random sample of genomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-018-0476-3

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary explanation for positive LDSC estimates of correlation between DGEs and average NTCs for height and EA is likely assortative mating, which is strong for EA and height, although IGEs that are positively correlated with DGEs could also contribute.

    “The primary explanation is likely AM, which is strong for EA and height25,31, although IGEs that are positively correlated with DGEs could also contribute3.”

    From Family-GWAS reveals effects of environment and mating on genetic associations (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GWAS associations for some phenotypes estimated from samples of unrelated individuals also capture effects of demography (assortative mating and population stratification) and indirect genetic effects of relatives.

    “However, there is growing evidence that GWAS associations for some phenotypes estimated from samples of unrelated individuals also capture effects of demography7,8 (assortative mating9–11 and population stratification12) and indirect genetic effects of relatives13–19 (Fig. 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yengo, L., Robinson, M. R., Keller, M. C., Kemper, K. E., Yang, Y., Trzaskowski, M., Gratten, J., Turley, P., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., Wray, N. R., Goddard, M. E., Yang, J., & Visscher, P. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Translational Research Institute (AU)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Visscher, Peter M.
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
948-954
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952585581
Cited by
148
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council (1107258, 1113400, 1078037, 1078901, 1127440, 1103418)
  • Australian Research Council (DP160103860, DP160102400, DP130102666, 1113400)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1113400, 1078901, 1127440, 1107258, 1078037, 1103418)
  • National Institute on Aging (RC2AG036607, R56AG042568, R01AG042568)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100141)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM099568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
assortative mating, mate choice, human genome, single nucleotide polymorphisms, population stratification, height, educational attainment, complex traits, genome organization
MeSH terms
Alleles, Body Height, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Genome, Human, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review