Cited by 141Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in national and international registries

Open access
Gorostidi, Manuel, Vinyoles, Ernest, Banegas, José R, de la Sierra, Alejandro·2015·Hypertension Research

Abstract

In the past two decades, techniques for the measurement of blood pressure outside the medical setting have unmasked highly prevalent situations. A significant proportion of patients with office blood pressure levels above the thresholds for diagnosing hypertension or above the limits where those being treated are considered to be adequately controlled actually show normal ambulatory blood pressure levels. These patients have white-coat hypertension if untreated or false resistance to antihypertensive therapy because of the white-coat effect if treated. However, some individuals with normal office blood pressure measurements show elevated ambulatory blood pressure levels, and thus have masked hypertension if untreated or masked uncontrolled hypertension if treated. When looking for white-coat hypertension in patients with elevated office blood pressure levels or when looking for masked hypertension in office-controlled patients, up to one in three patients in each scenario would have white-coat or masked hypertension. Although related clinical factors, such as age, gender and global cardiovascular risk, are associated with both conditions, their abilities to predict such a misclassification are very low. Thus, assessing individual blood pressure levels by means of an ambulatory technique, particularly ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, is now considered a priority in diagnosing hypertension and in evaluating hypertension control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/hr.2014.149

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Office BP is consistently least predictive of cardiovascular outcomes among BP measurement methods due to white-coat and masked effects.

    “Although office BP was the most commonly used method by the included RCTs and in clinical practice, it is consistently least predictive of cardiovascular outcomes among BP measurement methods due to both white-coat and masked effects 51,52”

    From Effect and Acceptability of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure or Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction says office BP is a momentary measure affected by the clinical setting and that ambulatory monitoring estimates true BP more accurately. The Misclassification section identifies white-coat and masked hypertension as reasons office and ambulatory assessments disagree. The paper does not establish that office BP is consistently the least predictive method for cardiovascular outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Llisterri JL, Alonso FJ, Gorostidi M, Sierra C, de la Sierra A, Banegas JR, Segura J, Sobrino J, de la Cruz JJ, Madruga F, Aranda P, Redon J, Ruilope LM. En representación de los investigadores del Proyecto CARDIORISC-MAPAPRES. Sociedad Española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) Differences between office and ambulatory control of hypertension in very elderly patients. The CARDIORISC -MAPAPRES project. Med Clin (Barc) 2009; 133: 769-776.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gorostidi, M., Vinyoles, E., Banegas, J. R., & de la Sierra, A.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Hypertension Research
Published
2014-10-16
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0916-9636 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-4214
OpenAlex
W2077649372
Cited by
141
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
white coat hypertension, masked hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, office blood pressure, hypertension misclassification, hypertension control, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Humans, Prevalence, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, White Coat Hypertension, Masked Hypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review