Cited by 142Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exercise blood pressure: clinical relevance and correct measurement

Open access
Sharman, J E, LaGerche, A·2015·Journal of Human Hypertension

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is a mandatory safety measure during graded intensity clinical exercise stress testing. While it is generally accepted that exercise hypotension is a poor prognostic sign linked to severe cardiac dysfunction, recent meta-analysis data also implicate excessive rises in submaximal exercise BP with adverse cardiovascular events and mortality, irrespective of resting BP. Although more data is needed to derive submaximal normative BP thresholds, the association of a hypertensive response to exercise with increased cardiovascular risk may be due to underlying hypertension that has gone unnoticed by conventional resting BP screening methods. Delayed BP decline during recovery is also associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Thus, above and beyond being used as a routine safety measure during stress testing, exercise (and recovery) BP may be useful for identifying high-risk individuals and also as an aid to optimise care through appropriate follow-up after exercise stress testing. Accordingly, careful attention should be paid to correct measurement of exercise stress test BP (before, during and after exercise) using a standardised approach with trained operators and validated BP monitoring equipment (manual or automated). Recommendations for exercise BP measurement based on consolidated international guidelines and expert consensus are presented in this review.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jhh.2014.84

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 142

Metadata

Authors
Sharman, J. E., & LaGerche, A.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Sharman, J E
Venue
Journal of Human Hypertension
Published
2014-10-02
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
351-358
ISSN
  • 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5527
OpenAlex
W2075705822
Cited by
142
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
blood pressure response to exercise, exercise stress testing, hypertension, cardiovascular risk, blood pressure measurement, cardiovascular mortality
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review