Cited by 132Schizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Common alleles contribute to schizophrenia in CNV carriers

Open access
Tansey, K E, Rees, E, Linden, D E, Ripke, S, Chambert, K D, Moran, J L, McCarroll, S A, Holmans, P +4 more·2016·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

The genetic architecture of schizophrenia is complex, involving risk alleles ranging from common alleles of weak effect to rare alleles of large effect, the best exemplar of the latter being large copy number variants (CNVs). It is currently unknown whether pathophysiology in those with defined rare mutations overlaps with that in other individuals with the disorder who do not share the same rare mutation. Under an extreme heterogeneity model, carriers of specific high-penetrance mutations form distinct subgroups. In contrast, under a polygenic threshold model, high-penetrance rare allele carriers possess many risk factors, of which the rare allele is the only one, albeit an important, factor. Under the latter model, cases with rare mutations can be expected to share some common risk alleles, and therefore pathophysiological mechanisms, with cases without the same mutation. Here we show that, compared with controls, individuals with schizophrenia who have known pathogenic CNVs carry an excess burden of common risk alleles ( P =2.25 × 10 −17 ) defined from a genome-wide association study largely based on individuals without known CNVs. Our finding is not consistent with an extreme heterogeneity model for CNV carriers, but does offer support for the polygenic threshold model of schizophrenia. That this is so provides support for the notion that studies aiming to model the effects of rare variation may uncover pathophysiological mechanisms of relevance to those with the disorder more widely.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2015.143

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some pleiotropy of copy number variants may be due to modification by genetic risk scores, because even in individuals with autism spectrum disorder or schizophrenia carrying large-effect de novo mutations there appears to be an additive effect of common variation on phenotypic expression.

    “Emerging evidence suggests that among other factors, some of this pleiotropy may be due to modification GRS because even in those with ASD or SCZ carrying large effect de novo mutations, there appears to be an additive effect of common variation on phenotypic expression (Tansey et al., 2016; Weiner et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tansey, K. E., Rees, E., Linden, D. E., Ripke, S., Chambert, K. D., Moran, J. L., McCarroll, S. A., Holmans, P., Kirov, G., Walters, J., Owen, M. J., & O'Donovan, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Owen, M J
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1085-1089
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W1919612153
Cited by
132
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-12-08)
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Broad Institute
  • European Commission (241909)
  • Cardiff University (G0800509)
  • Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K004360/1, G0801418, MR/P005748/1, MR/L010305/1, G0800509)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
schizophrenia, copy number variation, genetic architecture, rare variants, deadweight loss, genome-wide association study, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Alleles, Computer Simulation, Gene Frequency, Humans, Models, Genetic, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review