Cited by 398Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage

Stedman, Hansell H., Kozyak, Benjamin W., Nelson, Anthony, Thesier, Danielle M., Su, Leonard T., Low, David W., Bridges, Charles R., Shrager, Joseph B. +2 more·2004·Nature

Abstract

Powerful masticatory muscles are found in most primates, including chimpanzees and gorillas, and were part of a prominent adaptation of Australopithecus and Paranthropus, extinct genera of the family Hominidae. In contrast, masticatory muscles are considerably smaller in both modern and fossil members of Homo. The evolving hominid masticatory apparatus--traceable to a Late Miocene, chimpanzee-like morphology--shifted towards a pattern of gracilization nearly simultaneously with accelerated encephalization in early Homo. Here, we show that the gene encoding the predominant myosin heavy chain (MYH) expressed in these muscles was inactivated by a frameshifting mutation after the lineages leading to humans and chimpanzees diverged. Loss of this protein isoform is associated with marked size reductions in individual muscle fibres and entire masticatory muscles. Using the coding sequence for the myosin rod domains as a molecular clock, we estimate that this mutation appeared approximately 2.4 million years ago, predating the appearance of modern human body size and emigration of Homo from Africa. This represents the first proteomic distinction between humans and chimpanzees that can be correlated with a traceable anatomic imprint in the fossil record.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature02358

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stedman, H. H., Kozyak, B. W., Nelson, A., Thesier, D. M., Su, L. T., Low, D. W., Bridges, C. R., Shrager, J. B., Minugh-Purvis, N., & Mitchell, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Stedman, Hansell H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2004-03-25
Volume
428
Issue
6981
Pages
415-418
ISSN
  • 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4679
OpenAlex
W2009692755
Cited by
398
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
142.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Washington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
myosin heavy chain, MYH gene, frameshift mutation, masticatory muscles, hominin evolution, encephalization, human-chimpanzee divergence, molecular clock, muscle fiber size, Hominidae, Australopithecus, Paranthropus, Homo
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Pan troglodytes, Dogs, Exons, Fossils, Humans, Macaca, Masticatory Muscles, Molecular Sequence Data, Myosins, Phylogeny, Pongo pygmaeus, Skull, Time Factors, Hominidae, Frameshift Mutation, Myosin Heavy Chains, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review