Cited by 197Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

The Human Condition—A Molecular Approach

Open access
Pääbo, Svante·2014·Cell

Abstract

Research into when and where modern humans originated and how they differ from, and interacted with, other now-extinct forms of human has so far been the realm of archaeologists and paleoanthropologists. However, over the past decade, molecular geneticists have begun to study genomes of extinct humans. Here, I discuss where we stand today with respect to understanding how modern humans came to differ from Neandertals and other human forms that existed until about 30,000 years ago.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.036

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional studies of human neurogenetic mutations are challenging because the human brain has evolved novel circuits, cell types, and signaling pathways that are rare or absent in animal models.

    “Functional studies of human neurogenetic mutations are obviously challenging, due to the fact that the human brain has evolved dramatically in the last 2–3 million years, gaining novel circuits, cell types, and signaling pathways that are rare or absent in animal models (Geschwind and Rakic, 2013; Molnar et al., 2014; Paabo, 2014).”

    From Genetic Changes Shaping the Human Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Paabo, 2014

  • The human brain has evolved dramatically in the last 2-3 million years, gaining novel circuits, cell types, and signaling pathways that are rare or absent in animal models.

    “Functional studies of human neurogenetic mutations are obviously challenging, due to the fact that the human brain has evolved dramatically in the last 2–3 million years, gaining novel circuits, cell types, and signaling pathways that are rare or absent in animal models (Geschwind and Rakic, 2013; Molnar et al., 2014; Paabo, 2014).”

    From Genetic Changes Shaping the Human Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Paabo, 2014

  • Another 12 previously described protein-altering substitutions were not found among the genotypes analyzed.

    “We note that another 12 previously described1 protein-altering substitutions were not found among the genotypes analyzed here (in C21orf62, DHX29, FAM149B1, FRRS1L, GPT, GSR, HERC5, IFI44L, KLF14, PLAC1L, PTCD2, SCAF11).”
  • The 42 protein-altering changes for which the ancestral allele has not been observed in any present-day human constitute the strongest entry points into a molecular understanding of the human condition.

    “The 42 protein-altering changes for which the ancestral allele has not been observed in any present-day human, most of which have been presented before1, constitute without doubt the strongest entry points into a molecular understanding of the human condition, and should be prime candidates for experimental validation.”
  • Three genes (CASC5, SPAG5, and KIF18A) have been singled out as involved in spindle pole assembly during mitosis.

    “Indeed, three genes (CASC5, SPAG5, and KIF18A) have been singled out as involved in spindle pole assembly during mitosis1.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pääbo, S.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Pääbo, Svante
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
157
Issue
1
Pages
216-226
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030710978
Cited by
197
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
21.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
human origins, Neanderthals, extinct hominins, modern human evolution, human genome, Neanderthal DNA
MeSH terms
Animals, Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Hominidae, Genome, Human, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review