Cited by 407Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Evolution of human-specific neural SRGAP2 genes by incomplete segmental duplication

Open access
Dennis, Megan Y., Nuttle, Xander, Sudmant, Peter H., Antonacci, Francesca, Graves, Tina A., Nefedov, Mikhail, Rosenfeld, Jill A., Sajjadian, Saba +8 more·2012·Cell

Abstract

Gene duplication is an important source of phenotypic change and adaptive evolution. We leverage a haploid hydatidiform mole to identify highly identical sequences missing from the reference genome, confirming that the cortical development gene Slit-Robo Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 (SRGAP2) duplicated three times exclusively in humans. We show that the promoter and first nine exons of SRGAP2 duplicated from 1q32.1 (SRGAP2A) to 1q21.1 (SRGAP2B) ∼3.4 million years ago (mya). Two larger duplications later copied SRGAP2B to chromosome 1p12 (SRGAP2C) and to proximal 1q21.1 (SRGAP2D) ∼2.4 and ∼1 mya, respectively. Sequence and expression analyses show that SRGAP2C is the most likely duplicate to encode a functional protein and is among the most fixed human-specific duplicate genes. Our data suggest a mechanism where incomplete duplication created a novel gene function-antagonizing parental SRGAP2 function-immediately "at birth" 2-3 mya, which is a time corresponding to the transition from Australopithecus to Homo and the beginning of neocortex expansion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.033

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SRGAP2 gene family is composed of SRGAP2A, the ancestral gene shared by all mammals, and human-specific duplicates SRGAP2B, SRGAP2C, and SRGAP2D, which emerged through segmental duplications during hominin evolution over the past approximately 2-3 million years.

    “This family is composed of SRGAP2A, the ancestral gene shared by all mammals (named SRGAP2 in non-human species), human-specific (HS) gene duplicates SRGAP2B, SRGAP2C, and SRGAP2D, which emerged through segmental duplications during hominin evolution, over the past ∼2–3 million years.25,26”

    From Synaptic neoteny of human cortical neurons requires species-specific balancing of SRGAP2-SYNGAP1 cross-inhibition (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SRGAP2C dimerizes with SRGAP2A, acting as a dominant-negative inhibitor.

    “SRGAP2C dimerizes with SRGAP2A, acting as a dominant-negative inhibitor.”

    From Origin and Evolution of Genes in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms, Dynamics, and Functional Implications (2025) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Discussion says functional evidence suggests that partial SRGAP2 copies heterodimerize with full-length SRGAP2, creating a dominant-negative interaction. It proposes this mechanism rather than establishing it as the categorical fact stated in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This interaction inhibits SRGAP2A's role in promoting dendritic spine maturation and limiting spine density.

    “This interaction inhibits SRGAP2A’s role in promoting dendritic spine maturation and limiting spine density.”

    From Origin and Evolution of Genes in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms, Dynamics, and Functional Implications (2025) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes that partial SRGAP2 proteins interact with full-length SRGAP2 and act as dominant negatives, supporting inhibition of the ancestral protein. Our copy does not state that SRGAP2A promotes dendritic spine maturation or limits spine density, so it does not support those specific effects. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This duplication resulted in a truncated version of SRGAP2A that retains the F-BAR domain but lacks the RhoGAP and SH3 domains.

    “This duplication resulted in a truncated version of SRGAP2A that retains the F-BAR domain but lacks the RhoGAP and SH3 domains.”

    From Origin and Evolution of Genes in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms, Dynamics, and Functional Implications (2025) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Results (Evolutionary history of SRGAP2; page unavailable) say the duplicated copies are predicted to produce truncated proteins carrying nearly the entire F-BAR domain, not an intact one. The Discussion says they lack other functional domains, but the passages in our copy do not identify those domains specifically as RhoGAP and SH3. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SRGAP2C is a human-specific paralog of the ancestral SRGAP2A gene, arising approximately 2.4 million years ago through an incomplete segmental duplication.

    “SRGAP2C is a human-specific paralog of the ancestral SRGAP2A gene, arising approximately 2.4 million years ago through an incomplete segmental duplication.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennis, M. Y., Nuttle, X., Sudmant, P. H., Antonacci, F., Graves, T. A., Nefedov, M., Rosenfeld, J. A., Sajjadian, S., Malig, M., Kotkiewicz, H., Curry, C. J., Shafer, S., Shaffer, L. G., de Jong, P. J., Wilson, R. K., & Eichler, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Eichler, Evan E.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
149
Issue
4
Pages
912-922
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008677609
Cited by
407
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 15
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG002385, P01HG004120, R01HG002385, T32HG000035)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 058815, R01GM058815)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD071698)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
SRGAP2, gene duplication, human-specific genes, 1q21.1, cortical development, neocortex expansion, human evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Hydatidiform Mole, Mammals, Molecular Sequence Data, Pregnancy, Primates, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Evolution, Molecular, GTPase-Activating Proteins, DNA Copy Number Variations, Segmental Duplications, Genomic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review