Cited by 524Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesIon Channels and ReceptorsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste

Mueller, Ken L., Hoon, Mark A., Erlenbach, Isolde, Chandrashekar, Jayaram, Zuker, Charles S., Ryba, Nicholas J. P.·2005·Nature

Abstract

The sense of taste provides animals with valuable information about the nature and quality of food. Bitter taste detection functions as an important sensory input to warn against the ingestion of toxic and noxious substances. T2Rs are a family of approximately 30 highly divergent G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are selectively expressed in the tongue and palate epithelium and are implicated in bitter taste sensing. Here we demonstrate, using a combination of genetic, behavioural and physiological studies, that T2R receptors are necessary and sufficient for the detection and perception of bitter compounds, and show that differences in T2Rs between species (human and mouse) can determine the selectivity of bitter taste responses. In addition, we show that mice engineered to express a bitter taste receptor in 'sweet cells' become strongly attracted to its cognate bitter tastants, whereas expression of the same receptor (or even a novel GPCR) in T2R-expressing cells resulted in mice that are averse to the respective compounds. Together these results illustrate the fundamental principle of bitter taste coding at the periphery: dedicated cells act as broadly tuned bitter sensors that are wired to mediate behavioural aversion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03352

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quinine, a cognate bitter ligand, produced strong attraction in mice with expression of a bitter receptor in sweet-sensing taste receptor cells.

    “Most remarkably, quinine, a cognate bitter ligand, produced strong attraction in mice with expression of a bitter receptor in sweet-sensing taste receptor cells ([114](#B114)).”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [114]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, K. L., Hoon, M. A., Erlenbach, I., Chandrashekar, J., Zuker, C. S., & Ryba, N. J. P.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zuker, Charles S.
  • Ryba, Nicholas J. P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-03-10
Volume
434
Issue
7030
Pages
225-229
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1964468911
Cited by
524
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 32
FWCI
35.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2007-03-15)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grass Foundation
  • National Eye Institute
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
bitter taste, G protein-coupled receptors, taste coding, toxin avoidance
MeSH terms
Animals, Food Preferences, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Palate, Physical Stimulation, Species Specificity, Substrate Specificity, Taste, Tongue, Mice, Knockout, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review