Cited by 1,702Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesIon Channels and ReceptorsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Mammalian sweet taste receptors

Open access
Nelson, Greg, Hoon, Mark A., Chandrashekar, Jayaram, Zhang, Yifeng, Ryba, Nicholas J.P., Zuker, Charles S.·2001·Cell

Abstract

The sense of taste provides animals with valuable information about the quality and nutritional value of food. Previously, we identified a large family of mammalian taste receptors involved in bitter taste perception (the T2Rs). We now report the characterization of mammalian sweet taste receptors. First, transgenic rescue experiments prove that the Sac locus encodes T1R3, a member of the T1R family of candidate taste receptors. Second, using a heterologous expression system, we demonstrate that T1R2 and T1R3 combine to function as a sweet receptor, recognizing sweet-tasting molecules as diverse as sucrose, saccharin, dulcin, and acesulfame-K. Finally, we present a detailed analysis of the patterns of expression of T1Rs and T2Rs, thus providing a view of the representation of sweet and bitter taste at the periphery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00451-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All known sweet tastants are sensed by a single broadly tuned sweet taste receptor heterodimer of T1R2 and T1R3.

    “All known sweet tastants, including hexose sugars, D-amino acids, sweet proteins (such as monellin and thaumatin), and low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) are sensed by a single broadlytuned sweet taste receptor (STR), comprised of a heterodimer of class C, G-protein coupled receptors, T1R2, and T1R3 (15).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, G., Hoon, M. A., Chandrashekar, J., Zhang, Y., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ryba, Nicholas J.P.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
381-390
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4249590403
Cited by
1,702
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 80
FWCI
53.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
sweet taste receptor, T1R2, T1R3, sucrose, saccharin, dulcin, acesulfame-K, transgenic rescue, receptor expression patterns, taste perception
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, Multigene Family, Genetic Complementation Test, Cricetinae, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenylurea Compounds, Receptors, Cell Surface, RNA, Messenger, Saccharin, Substrate Specificity, Sucrose, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Taste Buds, Thiazines, Evolution, Molecular, Calcium Signaling, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Gene Expression Profiling, Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review