The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans
Open accessAbstract
Decision making in an uncertain environment poses a conflict between the opposing demands of gathering and exploiting information. In a classic illustration of this 'exploration-exploitation' dilemma, a gambler choosing between multiple slot machines balances the desire to select what seems, on the basis of accumulated experience, the richest option, against the desire to choose a less familiar option that might turn out more advantageous (and thereby provide information for improving future decisions). Far from representing idle curiosity, such exploration is often critical for organisms to discover how best to harvest resources such as food and water. In appetitive choice, substantial experimental evidence, underpinned by computational reinforcement learning (RL) theory, indicates that a dopaminergic, striatal and medial prefrontal network mediates learning to exploit. In contrast, although exploration has been well studied from both theoretical and ethological perspectives, its neural substrates are much less clear. Here we show, in a gambling task, that human subjects' choices can be characterized by a computationally well-regarded strategy for addressing the explore/exploit dilemma. Furthermore, using this characterization to classify decisions as exploratory or exploitative, we employ functional magnetic resonance imaging to show that the frontopolar cortex and intraparietal sulcus are preferentially active during exploratory decisions. In contrast, regions of striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex exhibit activity characteristic of an involvement in value-based exploitative decision making. The results suggest a model of action selection under uncertainty that involves switching between exploratory and exploitative behavioural modes, and provide a computationally precise characterization of the contribution of key decision-related brain systems to each of these functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The rewarding/motivating nature of “near misses” has been reported for gambling where they increase the desire to play (Clark et al., 2009; Daw et al., 2006; Kakade and Dayan, 2002).”
From Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models (2011) · cites this paper as Daw et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“A single set of parameters as frequently employed in our recent work (Daw et al., 2006; Gershman et al., 2009; Glascher et al., 2009) imposes a simple, but efficient regularization, which stabilizes the estimated model parameters.”
From States versus Rewards: Dissociable Neural Prediction Error Signals Underlying Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (2010) · cites this paper as Daw et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 25,268
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089
Daw, N. D., Niv, Y., & Dayan, P. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1560 · Cited by 2,533
Self-citationDissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning
O'Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094285 · Cited by 2,088
Self-citationA framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning
Montague, P., Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-05-01936.1996 · Cited by 2,066
Self-citationAbstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex
O'Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., Hornak, J., & Andrews, C. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/82959 · Cited by 2,003
Self-citationThe Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex
Koechlin, É., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088545 · Cited by 1,939
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain
O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Friston, K., Critchley, H., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00169-7 · Cited by 1,522
Self-citationReward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging
O’Doherty, J. P. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.016 · Cited by 1,426
Self-citationFMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task
Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0593 · Cited by 1,414
Midbrain dopamine neurons encode a quantitative reward prediction error signal
Bayer, H. M., & Glimcher, P. W. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.020 · Cited by 1,304
Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging
Ramnani, N., & Owen, A. M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1343 · Cited by 1,170
Encoding Predictive Reward Value in Human Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex
Gottfried, J. A., O'Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087919 · Cited by 1,165
Self-citationTracking the Hemodynamic Responses to Reward and Punishment in the Striatum
Delgado, M. R., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, C., Noll, D. C., & Fiez, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.6.3072 · Cited by 1,116
Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal Cortex
Sugrue, L. P., Corrado, G. S., & Newsome, W. T. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094765 · Cited by 1,030
Temporal Prediction Errors in a Passive Learning Task Activate Human Striatum
McClure, S. M., Berns, G. S., & Montague, P. R. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00154-5 · Cited by 917
REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2005) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x · Cited by 788
Prediction of immediate and future rewards differentially recruits cortico-basal ganglia loops
Tanaka, S. C., Doya, K., Okada, G., Ueda, K., Okamoto, Y., & Yamawaki, S. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1279 · Cited by 779
The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance
Usher, M., Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., Rajkowski, J., & Aston-Jones, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5401.549 · Cited by 715
The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking
Burgess, P. W., Veitch, E., de Lacy Costello, A., & Shallice, T. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00134-7 · Cited by 708
Metalearning and neuromodulation
Doya, K. (2002) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00044-8 · Cited by 704
Kaelbling, L. P. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4168.001.0001 · Cited by 599
Dopamine: generalization and bonuses
Kakade, S. M., & Dayan, P. (2002) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00048-5 · Cited by 495
Self-citationDorris, M. C., & Glimcher, P. W. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.009 · Cited by 440
The Role of Frontopolar Cortex in Subgoal Processing during Working Memory
Braver, T., & Bongiolatti, S. R. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1019 · Cited by 411
Owen, A. M. (1997) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00042-7 · Cited by 251
Gani, J., Sarkadi, K., & Vincze, I. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 85
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging
Haber, S. N., & Knutson, B. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.129 · Cited by 3,718
The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function
Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007 · Cited by 2,321
Learning the value of information in an uncertain world
Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., Walton, M. E., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1954 · Cited by 2,053
The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2007 · Cited by 1,916
Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors
Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027 · Cited by 1,779
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Daw, N. D., O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Daw, Nathaniel D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 441
- Issue
- 7095
- Pages
- 876-879
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2635947
- OpenAlex
- W2077611535
- Cited by
- 2,224
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 107
- FWCI
- 40.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- exploration-exploitation balance, curiosity, frontopolar cortex, intraparietal sulcus, striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, gambling task, reinforcement learning, value-based decision making, human decision-making, computational modeling of decision making
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Exploratory Behavior, Gambling, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
