Cited by 917Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Temporal Prediction Errors in a Passive Learning Task Activate Human Striatum

Open access
McClure, Samuel M, Berns, Gregory S, Montague, P.Read·2003·Neuron

Abstract

Functional MRI experiments in human subjects strongly suggest that the striatum participates in processing information about the predictability of rewarding stimuli. However, stimuli can be unpredictable in character (what stimulus arrives next), unpredictable in time (when the stimulus arrives), and unpredictable in amount (how much arrives). These variables have not been dissociated in previous imaging work in humans, thus conflating possible interpretations of the kinds of expectation errors driving the measured brain responses. Using a passive conditioning task and fMRI in human subjects, we show that positive and negative prediction errors in reward delivery time correlate with BOLD changes in human striatum, with the strongest activation lateralized to the left putamen. For the negative prediction error, the brain response was elicited by expectations only and not by stimuli presented directly; that is, we measured the brain response to nothing delivered (juice expected but not delivered) contrasted with nothing delivered (nothing expected).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00154-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClure, S. M., Berns, G. S., & Montague, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Montague, P.Read
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
339-346
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157088567
Cited by
917
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 77
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh061010-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH61010, R01MH52797, R01MH052797)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K08 DA00367, K08DA000367, R01-DA11723, R01DA011723)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
prediction error, striatum, putamen, reward anticipation, temporal prediction, expectation errors, BOLD signal
MeSH terms
Adult, Conditioning, Classical, Corpus Striatum, Cues, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Taste, Time Factors, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review