The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The architecture of human kin detection
Open accessAbstract
Evolved mechanisms for assessing genetic relatedness have been found in many species, but their existence in humans has been a matter of controversy. Here we report three converging lines of evidence, drawn from siblings, that support the hypothesis that kin detection mechanisms exist in humans. These operate by computing, for each familiar individual, a unitary regulatory variable (the kinship index) that corresponds to a pairwise estimate of genetic relatedness between self and other. The cues that the system uses were identified by quantitatively matching individual exposure to potential cues of relatedness to variation in three outputs relevant to the system's evolved functions: sibling altruism, aversion to personally engaging in sibling incest, and moral opposition to third party sibling incest. As predicted, the kin detection system uses two distinct, ancestrally valid cues to compute relatedness: the familiar other's perinatal association with the individual's biological mother, and duration of sibling coresidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Because pathogen undetectability and lethal allele homozygosity clearly threaten genetic extinction, incestuous sexual intercourse elicits core disgust (Lieberman et al. 2007).”
From Disgusting Bodies, Disgusting Religion: The Biology of Tantra (2011) · cites this paper as Lieberman et al. 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999) · Cited by 3,563
Lee, R. B., & DeVore, I. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,181
Inbreeding depression in the wild
Crnokrak, P., & Roff, D. A. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885530 · Cited by 975
Nepotism and the Evolution of Alarm Calls
Sherman, P. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.197.4310.1246 · Cited by 909
Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People.
Howell, N. E., Hill, K. R., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137817 · Cited by 841
The genetic basis of inbreeding depression
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D. (1999) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672399004152 · Cited by 802
The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes
Penn, D. J., & Potts, W. K. (1999) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303166 · Cited by 793
Evolution of Social Insect Colonies
Crozier, R. H., & Pamilo, P. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198549437.001.0001 · Cited by 771
Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection
Sivinski, J. M., Crozier, R. H., & Pamilo, P. (1997) · Florida Entomologist · doi:10.2307/3495984 · Cited by 650
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Queller, D. C. Inclusive fitness in a nutshell. Oxford Surveys Evol. Biol. 6, 73–109 (1989)
- Hewlett, B. & Lamb, M. Hunter–Gatherer Childhoods (Aldine Transaction, Somerset, New Jersey, 2005)
- Walters, J. R. in Kin Recognition in Animals (eds Fletcher, D. J. C. & Michener, C. D.) 359–393 (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social Brain: Neural Basis of Social Knowledge
Adolphs, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514 · Cited by 1,827
“…been proposed for how we process faces (see sidebar Face Processing and Modularity), for parametrically perceiving genetic relatedness (kinship) (Lieberman et al. 2007), and for detecting people who cheat on social contracts (Cosmides & Tooby 1992), an appealing idea from an evolutionary point…”
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,308
Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015474 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationFormidability and the logic of human anger
Sell, A. N., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904312106 · Cited by 849
“Subsequent research in humans confirmed the existence of a neurocognitive specialization that recalibrates altruism in response to cues of genetic relatedness (9).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDisgust: evolved function and structure
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030778 · Cited by 810
“These cues include childhood coresidence duration (Bevc & Silverman, 1993, 2000; Fessler & Navarrete, 2004; Lieberman, Tooby, & Cosmides, 2003; Lieberman et al., 2007), exposure to one's mother caring for a newborn (Lieberman et al., 2007), and perhaps facial and attitudinal similarity (DeBruine,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lieberman, Debra
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 445
- Issue
- 7129
- Pages
- 727-731
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3581061
- OpenAlex
- W2167697644
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 36.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DP1OD000516)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- genetic relatedness, inbreeding avoidance, human evolution, social cognition
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Altruism, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Cues, Data Collection, Humans, Incest, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Mothers, Sexual Behavior, Sibling Relations, Time Factors, Artifacts, Living Donors, Siblings, Heredity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
