The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing
Open accessAbstract
DNA ends exposed after introduction of double-strand breaks (DSBs) undergo 5′–3′ nucleolytic degradation to generate single-stranded DNA, the substrate for binding by the Rad51 protein to initiate homologous recombination. This process is poorly understood in eukaryotes, but several factors have been implicated, including the Mre11 complex (Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2/NBS1), Sae2/CtIP/Ctp1 and Exo1. Here we demonstrate that yeast Exo1 nuclease and Sgs1 helicase function in alternative pathways for DSB processing. Novel, partially resected intermediates accumulate in a double mutant lacking Exo1 and Sgs1, which are poor substrates for homologous recombination. The early processing step that generates partly resected intermediates is dependent on Sae2. When Sae2 is absent, in addition to Exo1 and Sgs1, unprocessed DSBs accumulate and homology-dependent repair fails. These results suggest a two-step mechanism for DSB processing during homologous recombination. First, the Mre11 complex and Sae2 remove a small oligonucleotide(s) from the DNA ends to form an early intermediate. Second, Exo1 and/or Sgs1 rapidly process this intermediate to generate extensive tracts of single-stranded DNA that serve as substrate for Rad51.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362
In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts
Nelms, B. E., Maser, R. S., MacKay, J. F., Lagally, M. G., & Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.590 · Cited by 500
EXO1-A multi-tasking eukaryotic nuclease
Tran, P. T., Erdeniz, N., Symington, L. S., & Liskay, R. M. (2004) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.05.015 · Cited by 201
Self-citation
Cited by
Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair
Chang, H. H. Y., Pannunzio, N. R., Adachi, N., & Lieber, M. R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.48 · Cited by 1,757
DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells
Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R., & Willis, N. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0 · Cited by 1,457
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · Cited by 1,066
Targeting DNA damage response pathways in cancer
Groelly, F. J., Fawkes, M., Dagg, R. A., Blackford, A. N., & Tarsounas, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00535-5 · Cited by 836
The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends
Stracker, T. H., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3047 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Mimitou, E. P., & Symington, L. S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-09-21
- Volume
- 455
- Issue
- 7214
- Pages
- 770-774
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1993026474
- Cited by
- 1,007
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07312
- The paper
- Mimitou, E. P., & Symington, L. S. (2008). Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.