The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication
Open accessAbstract
Post-replication repair (PRR) is a pathway that allows cells to bypass or overcome lesions during DNA replication. In eukaryotes, damage bypass is activated by ubiquitylation of the replication clamp PCNA through components of the RAD6 pathway. Whereas monoubiquitylation of PCNA allows mutagenic translesion synthesis by damage-tolerant DNA polymerases, polyubiquitylation is required for an error-free pathway that probably involves a template switch to the undamaged sister chromatid. Both the timing of PRR events during the cell cycle and their location relative to replication forks, as well as the factors required downstream of PCNA ubiquitylation, have remained poorly characterized. Here we demonstrate that the RAD6 pathway normally operates during S phase. However, using an inducible system of DNA damage bypass in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), we show that the process is separable in time and space from genome replication, thus allowing direct visualization and quantification of productive PRR tracts. We found that both during and after S phase ultraviolet-radiation-induced lesions are bypassed predominantly via translesion synthesis, whereas the error-free pathway functions as a backup system. Our approach has revealed the distribution of PRR tracts in a synchronized cell population. It will allow an in-depth mechanistic analysis of how cells manage the processing of lesions to their genomes during and after replication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In these conditions, repair may not be completed and the extension of the ssDNA region may meet two purposes: activating the checkpoint response and channeling the problematic lesion to a different repair pathway (e.g., recombination) [66–68].”
From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [67]
In the citing paper
“In fact, S phase can be completed in the absence of PRR, but the gapped replicated DNA needs to be refilled by PRR in G2 in order to warrant cell survival [66,67].”
From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Janke, C., Magiera, M., Rathfelder, N., Taxis, C., Reber, S., Maekawa, H., Moreno-Borchart, A. C., Doenges, G., Schwob, E., Schiebel, E., et al. (2004) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1142 · Cited by 2,251
RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO
Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G., Pyrowolakis, G., & Jentsch, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00991 · Cited by 2,202
EUKARYOTIC TRANSLESION SYNTHESIS DNA POLYMERASES: Specificity of Structure and Function
Prakash, S., Johnson, R. E., & Prakash, L. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133250 · Cited by 1,020
Jackson, D., & Pombo, A. (1998) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.140.6.1285 · Cited by 881
Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation
Stelter, P., & Ulrich, H. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01965 · Cited by 850
Self-citationInteraction of Human DNA Polymerase η with Monoubiquitinated PCNA
Kannouche, P. L., Wing, J., & Lehmann, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00259-x · Cited by 845
Eukaryotic polymerases ι and ζ act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions
Johnson, R. E., Washington, M. T., Haracska, L., Prakash, S., & Prakash, L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023030 · Cited by 632
Lopes, M., Foiani, M., & Sogo, J. M. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.015 · Cited by 563
Watanabe, K., Tateishi, S., Kawasuji, M., Tsurimoto, T., Inoue, H., & Yamaizumi, M. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600383 · Cited by 538
Crosstalk between SUMO and Ubiquitin on PCNA Is Mediated by Recruitment of the Helicase Srs2p
Papouli, E., Chen, S., Davies, A. A., Huttner, D., Krejčí, L., Sung, P., & Ulrich, H. D. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.001 · Cited by 522
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368
The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle
Hustedt, N., & Durocher, D. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3452 · Cited by 738
Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage
Sale, J. E., Lehmann, A. R., & Woodgate, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3289 · Cited by 665
Lange, S. S., Takata, K.-I., & Wood, R. D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2998 · Cited by 615
Chromatin replication and epigenome maintenance
Alabert, C., & Groth, A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3288 · Cited by 614
The Mechanisms of UV Mutagenesis
Ikehata, H., & Ono, T. (2011) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1269/jrr.10175 · Cited by 542
The Ubiquitin–Proteasome System of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Finley, D. J., Ulrich, H. D., Sommer, T., & Kaiser, P. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140467 · Cited by 449
Self-citationRegulation of PCNA–protein interactions for genome stability
Mailand, N., Gibbs‐Seymour, I., & Bekker‐Jensen, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3562 · Cited by 395
Chromosome Duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Bell, S. P., & Labib, K. P. M. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.186452 · Cited by 372
Forging Ahead through Darkness: PCNA, Still the Principal Conductor at the Replication Fork
Choe, K. N., & Moldovan, G.-L. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.020 · Cited by 325
Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human PrimPol
Mouron, S. A., Rodríguez‐Acebes, S., Martínez-Jiménez, M. I., García-Gómez, S., Chocrón, S., Blanco, L., & Méndez, J. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2719 · Cited by 345
Epigenetic Instability due to Defective Replication of Structured DNA
Sarkies, P., Reams, C., Simpson, L. J., & Sale, J. E. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.009 · Cited by 302
Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair
Ulrich, H. D., & Walden, H. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2921 · Cited by 280
Self-citationEmerging critical roles of Fe–S clusters in DNA replication and repair
Fuss, J. O., Tsai, C.-L., Ishida, J. P., & Tainer, J. A. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.01.018 · Cited by 262
Rescuing Stalled or Damaged Replication ForksPreprint
Yeeles, J. T. P., Poli, J., Marians, K. J., & Pasero, P. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012815 · Cited by 269
Replication stress: getting back on track
Berti, M., & Vindigni, A. (2016) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3163 · Cited by 249
DNA Fiber Analysis: Mind the Gap!
Quinet, A., Carvajal-Maldonado, D., Lemacon, D. S., & Vindigni, A. (2017) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2017.03.019 · Cited by 245
DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Bypass of DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Boiteux, S., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.145219 · Cited by 250
The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response
Al-Hakim, A., Escribano‐Diaz, C., Landry, M.-C., O’Donnell, L., Panier, S., Szilard, R. K., & Durocher, D. (2010) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.011 · Cited by 240
DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome.
Ghosal, G., & Chen, J. (2013) · PubMed · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2218-676x.2013.04.01 · Cited by 215
Tirman, S., Quinet, A., Wood, M. D., Meroni, A., Cybulla, E., Jackson, J., Pegoraro, S., Simoneau, A., Zou, L., & Vindigni, A. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.013 · Cited by 202
Makarova, А. V., Stodola, J. L., & Burgers, P. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks948 · Cited by 186
Hashimoto, Y., Puddu, F., & Costanzo, V. (2011) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2177 · Cited by 174
Visualization of recombination-mediated damage bypass by template switching
Giannattasio, M., Zwicky, K., Follonier, C., Foiani, M., Lopes, M., & Branzei, D. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2888 · Cited by 147
Signaling Pathways of Replication Stress in Yeast
Pardo, B., Crabbé, L., & Pasero, P. (2016) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fow101 · Cited by 146
DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structures
Branzei, D., & Szakál, B. (2016) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.008 · Cited by 154
Targeting DNA repair pathway in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical application
Wang, M., Chen, S., & Ao, D. (2021) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.103 · Cited by 140
Translesion DNA Synthesis and Mutagenesis in ProkaryotesPreprint
Fuchs, R. P., & Fujii, S. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012682 · Cited by 128
Simoneau, A., Xiong, R., & Zou, L. (2021) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.348479.121 · Cited by 131
Premature Cdk1/Cdc5/Mus81 pathway activation induces aberrant replication and deleterious crossover
Szakál, B., & Branzei, D. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.67 · Cited by 122
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
Taylor, M. R. G., & Yeeles, J. T. P. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.022 · Cited by 121
Nucleases Acting at Stalled Forks: How to Reboot the Replication Program with a Few Shortcuts
Pasero, P., & Vindigni, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024745 · Cited by 130
UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts
Elvers, I., Johansson, F., Groth, P., Erixon, K., & Helleday, T. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr420 · Cited by 124
Diamant, N., Hendel, A., Vered, I., Carell, T., Reißner, T., de Wind, N., Geacinov, N., & Livneh, Z. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr596 · Cited by 109
To skip or not to skip: choosing repriming to tolerate DNA damage
Quinet, A., Tirman, S., Cybulla, E., Meroni, A., & Vindigni, A. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.01.012 · Cited by 123
Regulation of Rad6/Rad18 Activity During DNA Damage Tolerance
Hedglin, M., & Benkovic, S. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-033841 · Cited by 106
Nicolae, C. M., Aho, E. R., Vlahos, A. H. S., Choe, K. N., De, S., Karras, G. I., & Moldovan, G. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.556340 · Cited by 109
Mechanisms of DNA Damage Tolerance: Post-Translational Regulation of PCNA
Leung, W., Baxley, R. M., Moldovan, G., & Bielinsky, A. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10010010 · Cited by 100
Mutator phenotypes due to DNA replication infidelity
Arana, M. E., & Kunkel, T. A. (2010) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.10.003 · Cited by 103
Charles, J. S., Hazkani‐Covo, E., Yin, Y. A., Andersen, S. L., Dietrich, F. S., Greenwell, P. W., Malc, E. P., Mieczkowski, P. A., & Petes, T. D. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137927 · Cited by 92
Noncanonical Role of the 9-1-1 Clamp in the Error-Free DNA Damage Tolerance Pathway
Karras, G. I., Fumasoni, M., Sienski, G., Vanoli, F., Branzei, D., & Jentsch, S. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.016 · Cited by 94
Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance
González‐Prieto, R., Muñoz-Cabello, A. M., Cabello-Lobato, M. J., & Prado, F. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.73 · Cited by 89
Ubiquitin family modifications and template switching
Branzei, D. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.053 · Cited by 88
Functions of Ubiquitin and SUMO in DNA Replication and Replication Stress
García‐Rodríguez, N., Wong, R. P. C., & Ulrich, H. D. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00087 · Cited by 90
Self-citationReconstitution of translesion synthesis reveals a mechanism of eukaryotic DNA replication restart
Guilliam, T. A., & Yeeles, J. T. P. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0418-4 · Cited by 82
Building up and breaking down: mechanisms controlling recombination during replication
Branzei, D., & Szakál, B. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409238.2017.1304355 · Cited by 84
Aksenova, A. Y., Volkov, K. V., Maceluch, J., Pursell, Z. F., Rogozin, I. B., Kunkel, T. A., Pavlov, Y. I., & Johansson, E. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001209 · Cited by 78
Roles of sequential ubiquitination of PCNA in DNA‐damage tolerance
Zhang, W., Qin, Z., Zhang, X., & Xiao, W. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.044 · Cited by 80
Pozhidaeva, A., Pustovalova, Y., D’Souza, S., Bezsonova, I., Walker, G. C., & Korzhnev, D. M. (2012) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi300566z · Cited by 80
Translesion synthesis mechanisms depend on the nature of DNA damage in UV-irradiated human cells
Quinet, A., Martins, D. J., Vessoni, A. T., Biard, D., Sarasin, A., Stary, A., & Menck, C. F. M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw280 · Cited by 76
The ubiquitin ligase RFWD3 is required for translesion DNA synthesis
Gallina, I., Hendriks, I. A., Hoffmann, S., Larsen, N. B., Johansen, J., Colding-Christensen, C. S., Schubert, L. A., Sellés‐Baiget, S., Fábián, Z., Kühbacher, U., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.11.029 · Cited by 78
Branzei, D., & Psakhye, I. (2016) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.015 · Cited by 80
The Emerging Role of Cohesin in the DNA Damage Response
Litwin, I., Pilarczyk, E., & Wysocki, R. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9120581 · Cited by 80
Roles of trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy
Anand, J. R., Chiou, L. F., Sciandra, C. A., Zhang, X., Hong, J., Wu, D., Zhou, P., & Vaziri, C. (2023) · NAR Cancer · doi:10.1093/narcan/zcad005 · Cited by 75
Timing and spacing of ubiquitin‐dependent DNA damage bypass
Ulrich, H. D. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.028 · Cited by 77
Self-citationWong, R. P. C., García‐Rodríguez, N., Zilio, N., Hanulová, M., & Ulrich, H. D. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.015 · Cited by 72
Self-citationSrs2 mediates PCNA‐SUMO‐dependent inhibition of DNA repair synthesis
Burkovics, P., Šebesta, M., Sisáková, A., Plault, N., Szukacsov, V., Robert, T., Pintér, L., Marini, V., Kolesár, P., Haracska, L., et al. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.9 · Cited by 71
Boyer, A.-S., Walter, D., & Sørensen, C. S. (2016) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.01.001 · Cited by 72
Quinet, A., Vessoni, A. T., Rocha, C. R. R., Gottifredi, V., Biard, D., Sarasin, A., Menck, C. F. M., & Stary, A. (2014) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.12.005 · Cited by 70
Regulation of the DNA damage response by ubiquitin conjugation
Brinkmann, K., Schell, M. J., Hoppe, T., & Kashkar, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00098 · Cited by 75
APC/CCdh1-dependent proteolysis of USP1 regulates the response to UV-mediated DNA damage
Cotto-Rios, X. M., Jones, M. V., Busino, L., Pagano, M., & Huang, T. T. (2011) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201101062 · Cited by 69
Mechanisms of PARP1 inhibitor resistance and their implications for cancer treatment
Jackson, L. M., & Moldovan, G. (2022) · NAR Cancer · doi:10.1093/narcan/zcac042 · Cited by 69
Integrating DNA damage repair with the cell cycle
Murray, J. M., & Carr, A. M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2018.03.006 · Cited by 69
DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease
Muñoz, S., & Méndez, J. (2016) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-016-0573-x · Cited by 70
Guilliam, T. A., & Doherty, A. J. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8010020 · Cited by 70
DNA repair factor RAD18 and DNA polymerase Polκ confer tolerance of oncogenic DNA replication stress
Yang, Y., Gao, Y., Mutter-Rottmayer, L., Zlatanou, A., Durando, M., Ding, W., Wyatt, D. W., Ramsden, D. A., Tanoue, Y., Tateishi, S., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201702006 · Cited by 67
Molecular and physiological consequences of faulty eukaryotic ribonucleotide excision repair
Kellner, V., & Luke, B. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019102309 · Cited by 67
Strand invasion by HLTF as a mechanism for template switch in fork rescue
Burkovics, P., Šebesta, M., Balogh, D., Haracska, L., & Krejčí, L. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1040 · Cited by 62
Error-free DNA-damage tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Xu, X., Blackwell, S., Lin, A., Li, F., Qin, Z., & Xiao, W. (2015) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.02.001 · Cited by 66
DNA bending facilitates the error‐free DNA damage tolerance pathway and upholds genome integrity
González‐Huici, V., Szakál, B., Urulangodi, M., Psakhye, I., Castellucci, F., Menolfi, D., Rajakumara, E., Fumasoni, M., Bermejo, R., Jentsch, S., et al. (2014) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/embj.201387425 · Cited by 61
Ziv, O., Zeisel, A., Mirlas-Neisberg, N., Swain, U., Nevo, R., Ben-Chetrit, N., Martelli, M. P., Rossi, R., Schiesser, S., Canman, C. E., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6437 · Cited by 59
Rad5 Plays a Major Role in the Cellular Response to DNA Damage during Chromosome Replication
Ortiz-Bazán, M. Á., Gallo-Fernández, M., Saugar, I., Jiménez-Martín, A., Vázquez, M. V., & Tercero, J. A. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.005 · Cited by 64
Targeting the Translesion Synthesis Pathway for the Development of Anti-Cancer Chemotherapeutics
Korzhnev, D. M., & Hadden, M. K. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00596 · Cited by 58
Tirman, S., Cybulla, E., Quinet, A., Meroni, A., & Vindigni, A. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409238.2020.1841089 · Cited by 60
Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast—sources and mechanisms
Skoneczna, A., Kaniak, A., & Skoneczny, M. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv028 · Cited by 59
Structure of monoubiquitinated PCNA
Zhang, Z., Zhang, S., Lin, S. H. S., Wang, X., Wu, L., Lee, E. Y. C., & Lee, M. (2012) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.20595 · Cited by 57
Rudd, S. G., Glover, L., Jóźwiakowski, S. K., Horn, D., & Doherty, A. J. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.034 · Cited by 56
Mechanisms of Post-Replication DNA Repair
Gao, Y., Mutter‐Rottmayer, E., Zlatanou, A., Vaziri, C., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8020064 · Cited by 58
Rad5 Recruits Error-Prone DNA Polymerases for Mutagenic Repair of ssDNA Gaps on Undamaged Templates
Gallo, D., Kim, T. P., Szakál, B., Saayman, X., Narula, A., Park, Y., Branzei, D., Zhang, Z., & Brown, G. W. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.001 · Cited by 56
A role for chromatin remodellers in replication of damaged DNA
Niimi, A., Chambers, A. L., Downs, J. A., & Lehmann, A. R. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks453 · Cited by 59
Strategic role of the ubiquitin-dependent segregase p97 (VCP or Cdc48) in DNA replication
Ramadan, K., Halder, S., Wiseman, K., & Vaz, B. (2016) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-016-0587-4 · Cited by 56
Hung, S.-H., Wong, R. P. C., Ulrich, H. D., & Kao, C.-F. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612633114 · Cited by 54
Self-citationWorking on Genomic Stability: From the S-Phase to Mitosis
Ovejero, S., Bueno, A., & Sacristán, M. P. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11020225 · Cited by 61
Repriming DNA synthesis: an intrinsic restart pathway that maintains efficient genome replication
Bainbridge, L. J., Teague, R., & Doherty, A. J. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab176 · Cited by 54
Reversal of PCNA Ubiquitylation by Ubp10 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Gallego-Sánchez, A., Andrés, S., Conde, F., San-Segundo, P. A., & Bueno, A. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002826 · Cited by 52
Ubiquitin and SUMO in DNA repair at a glance
Ulrich, H. D. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.091801 · Cited by 56
Self-citationUbiquitination of PCNA and Its Essential Role in Eukaryotic Translesion Synthesis
Chen, J., Bozza, W. P., & Zhuang, Z. (2011) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s12013-011-9187-3 · Cited by 58
Diverse roles of RAD18 and Y-family DNA polymerases in tumorigenesis
Yang, Y., Gao, Y., Zlatanou, A., Tateishi, S., Yurchenko, V., Rogozin, I. B., & Vaziri, C. (2018) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2018.1456296 · Cited by 52
Mechanism of DNA damage tolerance
Bi, X. (2015) · World Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.4331/wjbc.v6.i3.48 · Cited by 59
Pustovalova, Y. E., Maciejewski, M. W., & Korzhnev, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.029 · Cited by 50
Hedglin, M., & Benkovic, S. J. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00046 · Cited by 50
Spatial separation between replisome‐ and template‐induced replication stress signaling
García‐Rodríguez, N., Morawska, M., Wong, R. P. C., Daigaku, Y., & Ulrich, H. D. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798369 · Cited by 50
Self-citationTsanov, N., Kermi, C., Coulombe, P., van der Laan, S., Hodroj, D., & Maiorano, D. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1400 · Cited by 50
Causes and consequences of ribonucleotide incorporation into nuclear DNA
Dalgaard, J. Z. (2012) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.008 · Cited by 55
Yoon, J.-H., Park, J., Conde, J., Wakamiya, M., Prakash, L., & Prakash, S. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.272229.115 · Cited by 47
Waisertreiger, I. S.-R., Liston, V. G., Menezes, M. R., Kim, H., Lobachev, K. S., Stepchenkova, E. I., Tahirov, T. H., Rogozin, I. B., & Pavlov, Y. I. (2012) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.21735 · Cited by 46
Izhar, L., Ziv, O., Cohen, I. S., Geacintov, N. E., & Livneh, Z. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216894110 · Cited by 46
The Rev1 translesion synthesis polymerase has multiple distinct DNA binding modes
de Groote, F. H., Jansen, J. G., Masuda, Y., Shah, D. M., Kamiya, K., de Wind, N., & Siegal, G. (2011) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.04.033 · Cited by 45
Wit, N., Buoninfante, O. A., van den Berk, P. C. M., Jansen, J. G., Hogenbirk, M. A., de Wind, N., & Jacobs, H. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1301 · Cited by 49
Gellon, L., Razidlo, D. F., Gleeson, O., Verra, L., Schulz, D., Lahue, R. S., & Freudenreich, C. H. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001298 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Daigaku, Y., Davies, A. A., & Ulrich, H. D.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Research UK (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ulrich, Helle D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-05-09
- Volume
- 465
- Issue
- 7300
- Pages
- 951-955
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2888004
- OpenAlex
- W2080574942
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (A7123, A10152)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- DNA damage bypass, translesion synthesis, error-free bypass, genome replication, S phase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, replication fork, DNA polymerase, monoubiquitylation, polyubiquitination, template switching, sister chromatids, cell cycle synchronization
- MeSH terms
- Cell Cycle, Chromatin, DNA Damage, DNA Replication, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Time Factors, Ultraviolet Rays, Genome, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Ubiquitin, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review