Cited by 140Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Deposition of 1.88-billion-year-old iron formations as a consequence of rapid crustal growth

Rasmussen, Birger, Fletcher, Ian R., Bekker, Andrey, Muhling, Janet R., Gregory, Courtney J., Thorne, Alan M.·2012·Nature

Abstract

Iron formations are chemical sedimentary rocks comprising layers of iron-rich and silica-rich minerals whose deposition requires anoxic and iron-rich (ferruginous) sea water. Their demise after the rise in atmospheric oxygen by 2.32 billion years (Gyr) ago has been attributed to the removal of dissolved iron through progressive oxidation or sulphidation of the deep ocean. Therefore, a sudden return of voluminous iron formations nearly 500 million years later poses an apparent conundrum. Most late Palaeoproterozoic iron formations are about 1.88 Gyr old and occur in the Superior region of North America. Major iron formations are also preserved in Australia, but these were apparently deposited after the transition to a sulphidic ocean at 1.84 Gyr ago that should have terminated iron formation deposition, implying that they reflect local marine conditions. Here we date zircons in tuff layers to show that iron formations in the Frere Formation of Western Australia are about 1.88 Gyr old, indicating that the deposition of iron formations from two disparate cratons was coeval and probably reflects global ocean chemistry. The sudden reappearance of major iron formations at 1.88 Gyr ago--contemporaneous with peaks in global mafic-ultramafic magmatism, juvenile continental and oceanic crust formation, mantle depletion and volcanogenic massive sulphide formation--suggests deposition of iron formations as a consequence of major mantle activity and rapid crustal growth. Our findings support the idea that enhanced submarine volcanism and hydrothermal activity linked to a peak in mantle melting released large volumes of ferrous iron and other reductants that overwhelmed the sulphate and oxygen reservoirs of the ocean, decoupling atmospheric and seawater redox states, and causing the return of widespread ferruginous conditions. Iron formations formed on clastic-starved coastal shelves where dissolved iron upwelled and mixed with oxygenated surface water. The disappearance of iron formations after this event may reflect waning mafic-ultramafic magmatism and a diminished flux of hydrothermal iron relative to seawater oxidants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11021

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deposition of large, economically important IF coincided in time with mantle plume breakout events.

    “It is now widely accepted that the deposition of large, economically important IF coincided in time with mantle plume breakout events”
  • At ca. 1.88 Ga, shallow-marine GIFs were deposited above wave-base on several cratons, indicating a large flux of Fe(II) and Mn(II) from submarine-hydrothermal vents in association with an extensive LIP event.

    “At this time, shallow-marine GIFs were deposited above wave-base on several cratons (e.g., Rasmussen et al., 2012; Bekker et al., 2014) indicating a large flux of Fe(II) and Mn(II) from submarine-hydrothermal vents in association with an extensive LIP event.”
  • Despite declining Fe concentrations after the final Paleoproterozoic widespread IF deposition at 1.88 Ga, Fe utilization in biological systems remains high.

    “However, despite declining Fe concentrations following the final Paleoproterozoic episode of widespread IF deposition at 1.88 Ga (Rasmussen et al., 2012), Fe utilization in biological systems remains high.”

    From Trace elements at the intersection of marine biological and geochemical evolution (2016) · cites this paper as Rasmussen et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasmussen, B., Fletcher, I. R., Bekker, A., Muhling, J. R., Gregory, C. J., & Thorne, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Geological Survey of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Rasmussen, Birger
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-04
Volume
484
Issue
7395
Pages
498-501
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1969248880
Cited by
140
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
iron-formation, crustal growth, atmospheric oxygenation, ocean redox state, zircon geochronology, tuff layers, Western Australia, oceanic crust, Precambrian stratigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review