Cited by 656Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes

Open access
Simakov, Oleg, Marletaz, Ferdinand, Cho, Sung-Jin, Edsinger-Gonzales, Eric, Havlak, Paul, Hellsten, Uffe, Kuo, Dian-Han, Larsson, Tomas +18 more·2013·Nature

Abstract

Comparative analysis of the genomes of one mollusc (Lottia gigantea) and two annelids (Capitella teleta and Helobdella robusta) enable a more complete reconstruction of genomic features of the last common ancestors of protostomes, bilaterians and metazoans; against this conserved background they provide the first glimpse into lineage-specific evolution and diversity of the lophotrochozoans. This paper presents the draft genome sequences of two annelids — a freshwater leech (Helobdella robusta) and a bristly, segmented marine worm (Capitella teleta) — and a mollusc, the owl limpet (Lottia gigantea). These two phyla account for nearly one-third of known marine species and are of importance both ecologically and as experimental systems, yet they have not been served well by genomics efforts. Comparison of these genomes with those already available reveal some of the genetic changes linked to the origin and diversification of bilateral animals that are thought to have evolved during the 'Cambrian explosion' of multicellular life around 500 million years ago. Current genomic perspectives on animal diversity neglect two prominent phyla, the molluscs and annelids, that together account for nearly one-third of known marine species and are important both ecologically and as experimental systems in classical embryology1,2,3. Here we describe the draft genomes of the owl limpet (Lottia gigantea), a marine polychaete (Capitella teleta) and a freshwater leech (Helobdella robusta), and compare them with other animal genomes to investigate the origin and diversification of bilaterians from a genomic perspective. We find that the genome organization, gene structure and functional content of these species are more similar to those of some invertebrate deuterostome genomes (for example, amphioxus and sea urchin) than those of other protostomes that have been sequenced to date (flies, nematodes and flatworms). The conservation of these genomic features enables us to expand the inventory of genes present in the last common bilaterian ancestor, establish the tripartite diversification of bilaterians using multiple genomic characteristics and identify ancient conserved long- and short-range genetic linkages across metazoans. Superimposed on this broadly conserved pan-bilaterian background we find examples of lineage-specific genome evolution, including varying rates of rearrangement, intron gain and loss, expansions and contractions of gene families, and the evolution of clade-specific genes that produce the unique content of each genome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11696

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many conserved local (subchromosomal) linkages of genes exist across many clades despite hundreds of millions of years of divergence.

    “many conserved local (subchromosomal) linkages of genes across many clades despite hundreds of millions of years of divergence”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [3]Henry JQ Hejnol A Perry KJ Martindale MQ Homology of ciliary bands in spiralian trochophores Integr Comp Biol 47 865 871 2007 21669765
  2. [7]Berriman M The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni Nature 460 352 358 2009 19606141 PMC2756445
  3. [8]The Schistosoma japonicum Genome Sequencing and Functional Analysis Consortium The Schistosoma japonicum genome reveals features of host–parasite interplay Nature 460 345 351 2009 19606140 PMC3747554
  4. [9]Robb SM Ross E Sanchez Alvarado A SmedGD: the Schmidtea mediterranea genome database Nucleic Acids Res 36 D599 D606 2008 17881371 PMC2238899
  5. [10]Putnam NH The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype Nature 453 1064 1071 2008 18563158
  6. [11]Raible F Vertebrate-type intron-rich genes in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii Science 310 1325 1326 2005 16311335
  7. [13]Zamanian M The repertoire of G protein-coupled receptors in the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni and the model organism Schmidtea mediterranea BMC Genomics 12 596 2011 22145649 PMC3261222
  8. [16]Telford MJ Copley RR Improving animal phylogenies with genomic data Trends Genet 27 186 195 2011 21414681
  9. [17]Delsuc F Brinkmann H Philippe H Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life Nature Rev Genet 6 361 375 2005 15861208
  10. [18]Philippe H Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships Curr Biol 19 706 712 2009 19345102
  11. [20]Roy SW Gilbert W Resolution of a deep animal divergence by the patterns of intron conservation Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 4403 4408 2000 15769859 PMC555513
  12. [21]Roy SW Irimia M Rare genomic characteris do not support Coelomata: intron loss/gain Mol Biol Evol 25 620 625 2008 18281272
  13. [22]Rokas A King N Finnerty J Carroll SB Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree Evol Dev 5 346 359 2003 12823451
  14. [23]Srivastava M The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans Nature 454 955 960 2008 18719581
  15. [24]Duboule D The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters Development 134 2549 2560 2007 17553908
  16. [25]Frobius AC Seaver EC Capitella sp I homeobrain-like, the first lophotrochozoan member of a novel paired-like homeobox gene family Gene Expr Patterns 6 985 991 2006 16765105
  17. [26]de Rosa R Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution Nature 399 772 776 1999 10391241
  18. [27]Shimeld SM Boyle MJ Brunet T Luke GN Seaver EC Clustered Fox genes in lophotrochozoans and the evolution of the bilaterian Fox gene cluster Dev Biol 340 234 248 2010 20096280
  19. [28]Cho SJ Valles Y Giani VC Jr Seaver EC Weisblat DA Evolutionary dynamics of the wnt gene family: a lophotrochozoan perspective Mol Biol Evol 27 1645 1658 2010 20176615 PMC2912473

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simakov, O., Marletaz, F., Cho, S.-J., Edsinger-Gonzales, E., Havlak, P., Hellsten, U., Kuo, D.-H., Larsson, T., Lv, J., Arendt, D., Savage, R., Osoegawa, K., de Jong, P., Grimwood, J., Chapman, J. A., Shapiro, H., Aerts, A., Otillar, R. P., Terry, A. Y., Boore, J. L., Grigoriev, I. V., Lindberg, D. R., Seaver, E. C., Weisblat, D. A., Putnam, N. H., & Rokhsar, D. S.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • Joint Genome Institute (US)
  • Williams College (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Putnam, Nicholas H.
  • Rokhsar, Daniel S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-12-19
Volume
493
Issue
7433
Pages
526-531
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2073523429
Cited by
656
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 14
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DEAC02-05CH11231, 0850294, 0922792)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Joint Genome Institute (AC02-05CH11231, DE–AC02–05CH11231)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02–05CH11231)
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM074619)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
Lottia gigantea, Capitella teleta, lophotrochozoans, genome organization, gene structure, intron gain and loss, gene family expansion and contraction, comparative genomics, Cambrian explosion
MeSH terms
Animals, Genes, Homeobox, Multigene Family, Humans, Introns, Leeches, Genetic Linkage, Mollusca, Phylogeny, Polychaeta, Genome, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, Body Patterning, Synteny, Genetic Speciation, INDEL Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review