Cited by 199Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning

Open access
Fedorenko, Evelina, Scott, Terri L., Brunner, Peter, Coon, William G., Pritchett, Brianna, Schalk, Gerwin, Kanwisher, Nancy·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: How do circuits of neurons in your brain extract and hold the meaning of a sentence? To start to address this unanswered question, we measured neural activity from the surface of the human brain in patients being mapped out before neurosurgery, as they read sentences. In many electrodes, neural activity increased steadily over the course of the sentence, but the same was not found when participants read lists of words or pronounceable nonwords, or grammatical nonword strings (“Jabberwocky”). This build-up of neural activity appears to reflect neither word meaning nor syntax alone, but the representation of complex meanings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1612132113

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medium-level regions (areas along A1+ to STS) represent sentences.

    “while medium-level regions (areas along A1+ to STS) represent sentences (36, 37).”
  • The human language network is sensitive to abstract hierarchical rules across isolated phrases, naturalistic narratives, and syntactically well-formed but semantically empty stimuli.

    “it is sensitive to abstract hierarchical rules in isolated phrases and sentences [31, 108, 109, 110], in naturalistic narratives [111, 112, 113, 114], and in syntactically well-formed but semantically empty (”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [108]

  • The perisylvian fronto-temporal language network shows enhanced activity for stimuli that contain meaningful lexical items and sentence-level syntax.

    “The perisylvian fronto-temporal language network shows enhanced activity for stimuli that contain meaningful lexical items and sentence-level syntax (e.g. Fedorenko et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fedorenko, E., Scott, T. L., Brunner, P., Coon, W. G., Pritchett, B., Schalk, G., & Kanwisher, N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Fedorenko, Evelina
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-09-26
Volume
113
Issue
41
Pages
E6256-E6262
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2526072446
Cited by
199
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB00856, EB006356, EB018783)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-057522)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
sentence comprehension, sentence meaning, gamma power, intracranial recordings, language comprehension, compositional semantics, syntactic processing, word meaning, working memory, cognitive load, attention, human language evolution
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Electrodes, Female, Humans, Semantics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review