Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 627

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes

Betts, Matthew G., Wolf, Christopher, Ripple, William J., Phalan, Ben, Millers, Kimberley A., Duarte, Adam, Butchart, Stuart H. M., Levi, Taal·2017·Nature
DOI 10.1038/nature23285
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23285

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andrén, H. Effects of habitat fragmentation of birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71, 355–366 (1994) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Betts, M. G., Forbes, G. J. & Diamond, A. W. Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1046–1058 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barlow, J. et al. Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535, 144–147 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Peres, C. A. Why we need megareserves in Amazonia. Conserv. Biol. 19, 728–733 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brooks, T. M. et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–61 (2006) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mendenhall, C. D., Karp, D. S., Meyer, C. F., Hadly, E. A. & Daily, G. C. Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509, 213–217 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fahrig, L. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecol. Modell. 105, 273–292 (1998) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Phalan, B., Onial, M., Balmford, A. & Green, R. E. Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333, 1289–1291 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Tracewski, Ł. et al. Toward quantification of the impact of 21st-century deforestation on the extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 30, 1070–1079 (2016) · DOI
  11. Kim, D.-H. et al. Global, Landsat-based forest-cover change from 1990 to 2000. Remote Sens. Environ. 155, 178–193 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. & Nowak, M. A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66 (1994) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Wearn, O. R., Reuman, D. C. & Ewers, R. M. Extinction debt and windows of conservation opportunity in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 337, 228–232 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Sanderson, E. W. et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52, 891–904 (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hanski, I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 41–49 (1998) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Brooks, T. M. et al. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 16, 909–923 (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  17. Balmford, A. Extinction filters and current resilience: the significance of past selection pressures for conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 193–196 (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ripple, W. J. et al. Bushmeat hunting and extinction risk to the world’s mammals. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160498 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Bellard, C ., Genovesi, P . & Jeschke, J. M. Global patterns in threats to vertebrates by biological invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 283, 20152454 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Clavel, J., Julliar, R. & Devictor, V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 222–228 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  21. Betts, M. G. et al. A species-centered approach for uncovering generalities in organism responses to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecography 37, 517–527 (2014) · DOI
  22. Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600821 (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  23. Potapov, P. et al. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol. Soc. 13, 51 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Butchart, S. H. et al. Improvements to the red list index. PLoS ONE 2, e140 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  25. Butchart, S. H. et al. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds. PLoS Biol. 2, e383 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hoffmann, M. et al. The changing fates of the world’s mammals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 2598–2610 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  27. Böhm, M. et al. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 157, 372–385 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Wildlife Conservation Society and Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University. Last of the Wild, v2: Global Human Footprint Dataset (Geographic). http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4M61H5F (2005) · DOI
  29. Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  30. Seligman, M. Rborist: extensible, parallelizable implementation of the random forest algorithm. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rborist/index.html (2015) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.rborist
  31. Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A. & Buckland, S. T. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 339–347 (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  32. Dormann, C. F. Assessing the validity of autologistic regression. Ecol. Modell. 207, 234–242 (2007) · DOI
  33. Pike, N. Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2, 278–282 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  34. Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis in Psychology and Diagnostics: Collected Papers (Psychology Press, 2014) · DOI · Paper page
  35. Bahn, V. & McGill, B. J. Testing the predictive performance of distribution models. Oikos 122, 321–331 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  36. Dray, S., Legendre, P. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol. Modell. 196, 483–493 (2006) · DOI · Paper page
  37. Lee, D. CARBayes: an R package for Bayesian spatial modelling with conditional autoregressive priors. J. Stat. Softw. 55, 13 (2013)
  38. Klier, T. & McMillen, D. P. Clustering of auto supplier plants in the United States. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 26, 460–471 (2012) · doi:10.1198/073500107000000188
  39. Cardillo, M. et al. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 309, 1239–1241 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  40. Ives, A. R. & Garland, T. Jr. Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst. Biol. 59, 9–26 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  41. MacDicken, K. G. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: what, why and how? For. Ecol. Manage. 352, 3–8 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  42. Giam, X . et al. Reservoirs of richness: least disturbed tropical forests are centres of undescribed species diversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 67–76 (2012) · DOI
  43. Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 627

Metadata

Authors
Betts, M. G., Wolf, C., Ripple, W. J., Phalan, B., Millers, K. A., Duarte, A., Butchart, S. H. M., & Levi, T.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-07
Volume
547
Issue
7664
Pages
441-444
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/nature23285
OpenAlex
W2738705438
Cited by
627
References
8
FWCI
29.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature23285
The paper
Betts, M. G., Wolf, C., Ripple, W. J., Phalan, B., Millers, K. A., Duarte, A., Butchart, S. H. M., & Levi, T. (2017). Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.