Cited by 457Protein Structure and DynamicsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics

Open access

Abstract

De novo protein design holds promise for creating small stable proteins with shapes customized to bind therapeutic targets. We describe a massively parallel approach for designing, manufacturing and screening mini-protein binders, integrating large-scale computational design, oligonucleotide synthesis, yeast display screening and next-generation sequencing. We designed and tested 22,660 mini-proteins of 37-43 residues that target influenza haemagglutinin and botulinum neurotoxin B, along with 6,286 control sequences to probe contributions to folding and binding, and identified 2,618 high-affinity binders. Comparison of the binding and non-binding design sets, which are two orders of magnitude larger than any previously investigated, enabled the evaluation and improvement of the computational model. Biophysical characterization of a subset of the binder designs showed that they are extremely stable and, unlike antibodies, do not lose activity after exposure to high temperatures. The designs elicit little or no immune response and provide potent prophylactic and therapeutic protection against influenza, even after extensive repeated dosing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23912

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
Chevalier, A., Silva, D.-A., Rocklin, G. J., Hicks, D. R., Vergara, R., Murapa, P., Bernard, S. M., Zhang, L., Lam, K.-H., Yao, G., Bahl, C. D., Miyashita, S.-I., Goreshnik, I., Fuller, J. T., Koday, M. T., Jenkins, C. M., Colvin, T., Carter, L., Bohn, A., Bryan, C. M., Fernández-Velasco, D. A., Stewart, L., Dong, M., Huang, X., Jin, R., Wilson, I. A., Fuller, D. H., & Baker, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Baker, David
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
550
Issue
7674
Pages
74-79
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2759860792
Cited by
453
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 6
FWCI
18.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od021527-01, 5t32ai007354-30)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103403)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R41AI122431, R01AI091823, R56AI127371, R56AI117675, R21AI119258, R33AI119258, R21AI123920, T32-AI007354., R01AI125704)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS080833)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
de novo protein design, miniproteins, protein binders, influenza haemagglutinin, botulinum neurotoxin B, oligonucleotide synthesis, protein stability, antiviral agents, prophylactic protection, antibody alternatives, immune response
MeSH terms
Botulinum Toxins, Computer Simulation, Hot Temperature, Humans, Influenza, Human, Protein Binding, Proteins, Temperature, Drug Design, Protein Engineering, Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus, Protein Stability, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review