Cited by 742SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein Structure and Dynamics

De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 miniprotein inhibitors

Open access
Cao, Longxing, Goreshnik, Inna, Coventry, Brian, Case, James Brett, Miller, Lauren, Kozodoy, Lisa, Chen, Rita E., Carter, Lauren +7 more·2020·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Miniproteins against SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is decorated with spikes, and viral entry into cells is initiated when these spikes bind to the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Many monoclonal antibody therapies in development target the spike proteins. Cao et al. designed small, stable proteins that bind tightly to the spike and block it from binding to ACE2. The best designs bind with very high affinity and prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection of mammalian Vero E6 cells. Cryo–electron microscopy shows that the structures of the two most potent inhibitors are nearly identical to the computational models. Unlike antibodies, the miniproteins do not require expression in mammalian cells, and their small size and high stability may allow formulation for direct delivery to the nasal or respiratory system. Science , this issue p. 426

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abd9909

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The method yielded picomolar binders to the SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD near the ACE2 binding site, with an IC50 of 0.15 ng ml-1 in cell culture.

    “Similar to FGFR2, IL-7Rα and VirB8, the method yielded picomolar binders, which are among the most potent compounds known to inhibit the virus in cell culture (half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.15 ng ml–1).”
  • Cryo-EM structures of SARS-CoV-2 binders LCB1 and LCB3 in complex with the virus were nearly identical to the design models, with Cα r.m.s.d. values of 1.27 Å and 1.9 Å, respectively.

    “Further highlighting the accuracy of the protein interface design method, cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the SARS-CoV-2 binders LCB1 and LCB3 in complex with the virus were also nearly identical to the design models, with Cα r.m.s.d. value of 1.27 Å and 1.9 Å, respectively38 (Fig. 5f).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, L., Goreshnik, I., Coventry, B., Case, J. B., Miller, L., Kozodoy, L., Chen, R. E., Carter, L., Walls, A. C., Park, Y.-J., Strauch, E.-M., Stewart, L., Diamond, M. S., Veesler, D., & Baker, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, David
Venue
Science
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
370
Issue
6515
Pages
426-431
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3084236163
Cited by
742
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 37
FWCI
15.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ai140245-05, 1s10od023476-01)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM120553)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201700059C, R01-AI140245)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, miniproteins, de novo protein design, spike protein, ACE2 receptor, antiviral agents, viral entry inhibition, intranasal drug delivery, Vero E6 cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review